Guest editorial

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-03-2023-119
Published date16 March 2023
Date16 March 2023
Pages1-3
Subject MatterHealth & social care,Criminology & forensic psychology,Prisoner health,Sociology,Sociology of crime & law,Public policy & environmental management,Policing,Criminal justice
AuthorStephanie Grace Prost,Nickolas Zaller,Brie Williams
Guest editorial
Stephanie Grace Prost, Nickolas Zaller and Brie Williams
The number of older adults incarcerated in US prisons has burgeoned over the past
20 years (Carson, 2022; Williams et al., 2021). By the end of 2021, persons aged 55
years or older constituted 15.6% of populations held in state prisons and 13.3% of
those in federal prisons (Carson, 2022). This means roughly 178,000 older persons are
incarcerated in US prisons up from 165,700 in 2020 (Carson, 2021). Moreover, most
individuals who are under correctional control serve time in the community on probation or
parole. These populations have also grown markedly, tripling since 1980 (Pew Charitable
Trusts, 2018);inclusion of persons aged 55 years or older in these settings no doubtamplifies
the number of older persons under correctional control, though no national statistics have
been compiledregarding the age of persons on probation and parole since 1995.
Because health care for older adults is exceedingly complex and costly when compared to
younger adults, this large and growing older adult population under correctional control
(prisons, jails, parole or probation) ought to sound an alarm through the public health and
carceral fields. In this special issue of the International Journal of Prisoner Health, authors
describe their findings related to the continuum of care that exists for older adults with
criminal legal system involvement including programs in prisons and jails, reentry and
transitional services, compassionate release and community supervision. Readers are
encouraged to embrace strategies that target the unique health and social needs of older
adults during incarceration and throughout the community transition process. Though an
overarching effort to divert older adults from incarceration is urgently needed, correctional
programs and related services during incarceration are essential to mitigating both
chronic and acute medical problems and to staving off the cognitive decline and mental
illness in older adulthood of which persons in carceral settings are at disproportionate risk
(Ahalt et al., 2018;Kuffel et al., 2022;Li et al., 2022). Scholars have noted a dearth of
programs directed toward older adults with criminal legal system involvement (Canada
et al., 2020) and efforts to increase and enhance these approaches constitute a critical
opportunity for leadership in carceral settings. Tailored programs are essential to
maintaining and enhancing positive health and social outcomes of those who are eligible
for release and, importantly, those sentenced to life (with and without the opportunity for
parole)ordeathof which an exceedingly large proportion are older adul ts. Roughly 26%
of older adults in one sample were serving life, virtual life or death sentences (Prost et al.,
2020), a rate double that of national samples of persons who are incarcerated (13.9%;
Nellis, 2017).
Critically, programs and services within jails and prisons are unlikely to meet every need of
older adults. For this reason, optimizinggeriatric parole, compassionate release and related
mechanisms is essential. These mechanismsallow the termination or conversion of a prison
sentence to one served in the community for persons who meet certain health- and charge-
related criteria, though greatvariability exists between jurisdictions (Holland et al.,2020).As
learned during COVID-19,such strategies contributed to the rapid decarcerationof the most
vulnerable from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP; approximately 3,200 people), though
most releases were at the hands of federal judges rather than FBOP leadership [Equal
Justice Initiative (EJI), 2021]. Yet, many older adults who qualify for compassionate release
are not released (Pittaro,2023).
Stephanie Grace Prost is
based at the Raymond A.
Kent School of Social Work,
University of Louisville,
Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Nickolas Zaller is based at
the University of Arkansas
for Medical Sciences, Little
Rock, Arkansas, USA. Brie
Williams is based at the
School of Medicine, Center
for Vulnerable Populations,
UCSF, San Francisco,
California, USA.
DOI 10.1108/IJPH-03-2023-119 VOL. 19 NO. 1 2023, pp. 1-3, ©Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1744-9200 jINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRISONER HEALTH jPAGE 1

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT