Freedom of establishment and cross-border merging

AuthorFelicia Bejan
PositionThe Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Department of Law
Pages1-7
AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, www.juridicalj ournal.univagora.ro
ISSN 1843-570X, E-ISSN 2067-7677
No. 2 (2012), pp. 1-7
1
FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT AND CROSS-BORDER MERGING
F. Bejan
Felicia Bejan
The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Department of Law
*Correspondence: Felicia Bejan, Faculty of Political Science, 24 Sfântul tefan St. Bucharest,
Romania
E-mail: felicia.bejan@fspub.unibuc.ro
Abstract
According to the dispositions of the institutive treaties of the European Union, the
freedom of establishment of companies is essential for the functioning of the internal market.
Based on the importance of the companies’ mobility in the European space, the present paper
aims to analyze the contribution of the Directive 2005/56 on cross-border mergers of share
companies to transform the freedom of establishment of companies on the communitarian
territory, from theoretical principle to reality. The solution that the Directive on cross-border
mergers suggests to overcome the obstacle of the laws conflict and its extended domain of
application, have been particularly taken into account,
Keywords
:
freedom of establishment, cross-border merger, juridical regime, share
companies
Introduction
Cross-border merging was always considered by entrepreneurs as an optimum
instrument to exercise freedom of establishment, as it allows them to both concentrate their
activity, to reorganize themselves or to merely simplify the group’s structure, depending on
the particular individual situation.
On the other hand, the Jurisprudence of the Court of Justice regarding the freedom of
establishment stressed that “cross-border mergers represent specific methods to exercise the
freedom of establishment, essential to operate properly on the internal market and, as such,
are among those economic activities regarding which Member States must ensure the freedom
of establishment imposed by the Community Treaties”
1
.
The solutions identified by companies and confirmed by the Court of Justice were
found, unfortunately rather late, in a coherent legal framework on the Community level, able
to remove the legal obstacles blocking the implementation of cross-border mergers in the
Community.
Directive 2005/56 regarding cross-border mergers of share companies
2
established a
uniform legal framework for these operations. As a result, cross-border mergers of share
companies became an important juridical tool to ensure the mobility of companies inside the
European Union.
The positive evolution of cross-border mergers after the adoption of the Directive is
equally due to the legislative context and the evolution of the community’s jurisprudence that
appeared in this domain. Thus, the harmonization of domestic mergers under Directive
1
The Decision Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of December 13, 2005, case C-411/2003, SEVIC
System AG c. David Halsey (Her Majesty’s Inspector of Taxes).
2
Published in the Official Journal of the European Union, L. 310/2 5.11.2005.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT