Financing needs of micro-enterprises along their evolution

Date09 April 2020
Pages263-284
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2018-0071
Published date09 April 2020
AuthorRuslan Prijadi,Permata Wulandari,Putri Mega Desiana,Fajar Ayu Pinagara,Maya Novita
Subject MatterEconomics,Social economics
Financing needs of micro-
enterprises along their evolution
Ruslan Prijadi
Department of Management, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Permata Wulandari
Department of Management, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia and
Institute of Islamic Banking and Finance, International Islamic University
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and
Putri Mega Desiana,Fajar Ayu Pinagara and Maya Novita
Department of Management, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper aims to investigate micro enterprises nancing in Indonesia and
examines how this nancing differs, depending on the enterprises development stage. This research also
identiessome structural problems related to micro-nancingand provides workable solutions.
Design/methodology/approach This research uses the entrepreneurial networkmodel of Schutjens
and Stam (2003) to examine how Indonesian micro and small enterprises (MSEs) evolve even before they
become regular small businesses. Contentanalysis is used on 10 micro-enterprises from Jakarta, the capital
city of Indonesiaand its surroundings. Financing issues at each stage of enterprisedevelopment are identied
and deeply examined.
Findings This research not only conrms the signicant nancingproblems micro-enterprises face but
also clariesthat these problems are unique to each stage ofthe MSEsdevelopment. One insight is that most
micro-enterprisesdo not use funding from formal institutions. That is, business owners rely moreon funding
from non-formal institutions. This is because these enterprisesmanagers generally cannot prepare loans
application and/or they are lackof knowledge/training on nancing matters. They hesitate to borrow from
formal nancial institutions, as the rates are high but the processing time is longer than those of the loan
sharks.
Originality/value This research contributes to the eld of entrepreneurial nance by identifying the
structural problems inherent in micro-nance and providing workable solutions for overcoming these
problems.
Keyword Evolution, nancing, micro-enterprises, start-up, ongoing, content analysis
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Micro and small enterprises (MSEs) comprise the majority of companies in Indonesia and,
thus, play an important role in the countrys economic development. They contribute to the
national economy through the production and distribution of goods and services and by
providing employment opportunities for a large portion of the population. MSEs are also
important because it is within these enterprises where the entrepreneurial skills and
perseverance requiredto run a small independent business are nurtured and developed.
A small enterprise is a businessentity with a net worth of between Rp. 50 and Rp. 500 m
(in 2016, US$1 = Rp. 13,500),excluding the value of land and buildings. A micro-enterpriseis
an enterprise with a maximum net worth of Rp. 50m or a maximum income of Rp. 300m
Financing
needs of micro-
enterprises
263
Received5 May 2018
Revised17 May 2018
13July 2018
2November 2018
5November 2018
13January 2019
3April 2019
28July 2019
24November 2019
Accepted27 January 2020
InternationalJournal of Ethics and
Systems
Vol.36 No. 2, 2020
pp. 263-284
© Emerald Publishing Limited
2514-9369
DOI 10.1108/IJOES-05-2018-0071
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/2514-9369.htm
per year. In 2016, these enterprises provided53.4 million jobs or 44.3 per cent of Indonesias
total workforce, generated for more than Rp. 850bn in total added value and contributedto
60.34 per cent of the countrys gross domesticproduct.
Owners/managers of MSEs oftenlack fundamental business skills or knowledge related
to nancial reporting and marketing. This makes it difcult for them to access nancing
from banks or larger business-development networks (Denis, 2004;Allen et al.,2016). As a
result, most MSEs remain small because their owners/managers cannot turn their know-
how into a commercial success (Coad and Tamvada, 2012;Wangmo, 2015). The human
factors also play important roles in MSEs growth, which are not limited to business and
nancial aspects (Clark and Douglas, 2014). Although MSEs have certain shortcomings,
challenges related to nancing often originate within external entities, such as banks and
nancial and non-nancial services or local governments and their regulations.
Governments should be aware that their primary role is to remove barriers to MSEs
establishment and growth. Implementing policiesthat facilitate MSEsaccess to affordable
credit will also improve the service sector and encourage economic growth in Indonesia
(Aduda and Kalunda, 2012).
This research presumes that MSEs evolve throughout its development. It identies
and examines the nancing challenges these entities face at each stage of development
and how these challenges differ from one stage to another. To connect these nancing
issues within the concept of business development, this research follows the model used
by Schutjens and Stam (2003). In the model, the enterprise undergoes three stages of
development in terms of the evolution of itsnetworksasfollows:theconceptstageof
entrepreneurship, start-up and ongoing business operations. Figure 1 illustrates Butler
and Hansens application of the network model used in Schutjens and Stam (2003),which
is generally applied to examinations of newer companies.
Figure 1 shows each stage of MSES development, beginning with the initial
entrepreneurial stage,where the business opportunity is identied. Here, the entrepreneur is
focussed on building personal networks to help them develop their idea for a new business
(Stinchcombe, 1965; Aldrich, 1999).Butler and Hansen (1991) state that social networking is
very important in the entrepreneurial stage.This is because, in addition to building private
networks, extra effort is neededto mobilise existing resources (including social resources)to
promote the emerging business(Starr and MacMillan, 1990, in Johannisson, 1996).
Social networking involves cooperation, where members voluntarily work together to
achieve a common goal (Fukuyama, 1995). Penrose (1959) and Kirzner (1979) argue that
social networks increase opportunities because they allow entrepreneurs to identify
Figure 1.
Model of the
evolutionof the
entrepreneurial
network
IJOES
36,2
264

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT