Fideicommissum substitution in the civil code regulation and its practical use

AuthorCarmen Teodora Popa
PositionFaculty of Law, Department of Law University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
Pages55-61
AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/aijjs
ISSN 1843-570X, E-ISSN 2067-7677
No. 1 (2017), pp. 27-32
27
FIDEICOMMISSUM SUBSTITUTION IN THE CIVIL CODE
REGULATION AND ITS PRACTICAL USE
CARMEN TEODORA POPA
Carmen Teodora Popa
Faculty of Law, Department of Law
University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
Corespondence: Carmen Teodora Popa, University of Oradea, General Magheru St. Oradea,
Romania
E-mail: bnppopacarmen@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
This paper aims to analyze the fideicomission substitution in light of the change in the New
Civil Code in this field and its use in practice. Analyzing the current regulation in the matter
of the institution of fideicomission substitution, predominantly French, one can see a change
in the legislator's optic in relation to the old regulation where such a legal operation was
forbidden. From the point of view of practitioners, however, we have found that they call too
little or no such institution.
KEYWORDS: FIDEICOMISSION SUBSTITUTION, LIBERALITY, TESTAMENT,
ESTABLISHED, DISPOSE
1. SHORT HISTORY
The origin of the fideicomission substitution can be said to be the Roman law where
there were two operations that can be considered as precursors to the current fideicomission
substitution
1
substitution and fideicomisis. The substitution of heirs consists of a provision
whereby the disposer designates another person to take the place of the established heir, when
the latter would not have collected the inheritance. In Roman law there were several forms of
substitution: vulgar, pupil, quasi-pupil or exemplaris
2
.
Vulgar or habitual substitution is identified with that of the current regulation and is a
provision contained in a will by which a second legatee is appointed by the agent to receive
the property or goods as a subsidiary if the first legatee does not they might or would not
want to receive them.
Pupil substitution consists in appointing a person who would come to the inheritance
instead of the institution if the latter would have died before puberty.
Quasi-pupil substitution is the provision that allowed the parents of the family to
choose an heir to the child who, due to his state of mind, was unable to be tested
3
.
The Fideicomis was a provision contained in a testament that provided a gratification
request to preserve and transmit the good received to a second gratificated
4
.
1
J. Kocsis, P. Vasilescu, Drept civil. Succesiuni, [Civil law. Succession ], Editura Hamangiu, București, 2016,
p.189.
2
A.N. Gheorghe, Manual de drept succesoral,[ Manual o f succession law] Editura Hamangiu, București, 2013,
p.130.
3
Fr. Deak, R. Popescu, Tratat de drept succ esoral, [Inheritance la w]vol. II, Moștenirea testamentară, Editura
Universul juridic, București, 2014, p. 219.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT