Erratum

• Date: 01 July 2019
• Published date: 01 July 2019
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12214

International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 21, 400–401 (2019)

DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12214

Erratum

‘Embracing the Paradox of Interorganizational Value

Co-creation–Value Capture: A Literature Review to-

wards Paradox Resolution’ by Niesten and Stefan

(2019) in International Journal of Management Re-

views, volume 21 (issue 2), pp. 231–255. The fol-

lowing corrections were not incorporated in the print

version of the issue.

1. Abstract, row 5: ” . .. factors that make tensions

salient;” replace with “factors that make tensions

salient:”

2. Abstract, row 11: “This review also uncovers”

replace with “This review further reveals”

3. Abstract, row 14: “resolution, and” replace with

“resolution and”

4. Abstract, row 15: “The authors thus contribute

by” replace with “This study thus contributes by”

5. Abstract, row 18: “factors that solve the paradox”

replace with “factors that help solve the paradox”

6. Page 2, left column, 2nd paragraph, row 4: “In

Arrow’s (1962) ‘fundamental paradox’ “ replace

with “In Arrow’s (1962, p. 615) ‘fundamental

paradox’ “ – ‘fundamental paradox’ is a direct

quotation from Arrow, 1962

7. Page 2, left column, 2nd paragraph, penultimate

row: “proposed by paradox-theory” replace with

“proposed by paradox theory”

8. Page 2, right column, 1st paragraph, row 4:

“which in the present case would” replace with

“which, in the present case, would”

9. Page 2, right column, 2nd paragraph, row 11: “i.e.

in overlooking” replace with “i.e. overlooking”

10. Page 3, right column, 1st paragraph, row 20: “its

dynamics are largely overlooked” replace with

“its dynamics are widely overlooked”

11. Page 3, right column, 2nd paragraph, row2: “early

organizational scholars” replace with “earlier or-

ganizational studies”

12. Page 3, right column, 2nd paragraph, row 6: “Ten-

sions arise from these contradictions” replace

with “Tensions arise from such contradictions”

13. Page 4, right column, 2nd paragraph, row 1: “The

Smith and Lewis (2011) framework in itself” re-

place with “The framework by Smith and Lewis

(2011) in itself”

14. Page 5, figure 1: This figure is rather enhanced

and the text in the figure’s boxes appears much

larger than the text in the article. We would like

to keep the layout as is, meaning that we would

like figure 1 to keep occupying the same height

of page 5; but we would like to have figure 1

downsized a little, while increasing the margins

(left, right, up, down) between the edges of the

figure (i.e. the outer extremities of the boxes in

the figure) and the page margins.

15. Page 6, right column, 1st parag raph, row 1:

“share” replace with “contribution”

16. Page 6, right column, 1st paragraph, row 17: “by

Arrow (1962).” replace with “by Arrow (1962,

p. 615).”

17. Page 6, right column, 1st paragraph, rows 17–

18: “In the Smith and Lewis (2011) framework”

replace with “In the framework by Smith and

Lewis (2011)”

18. Page 6, right column, 1st paragraph, row 22:

“which in the framework are” replace with

“which, in the framework, are”

19. Page 7, right column, 4th paragraph, row 12: “vir-

tuous cycles occurring at the same time” replace

with “virtuous cycles both mentioned in the same

studies”

20. Page 8, left column, 1st paragraph, row 11:

“These codes on the core” replace with “These

codes at the core”

21. Page 8, right column, 2nd paragraph, row 9:

“resource-based view and the knowledge-based

view” replace with “resource-based view (RBV)

and the knowledge-based view (KBV)”

22. Page 9, left column, 2nd paragraph, row 15: “of

the Smith and Lewis framework” replace with

“of the framework by Smith and Lewis (2011)”

C2019 British Academy of Management and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Publishedby John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington

Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA