Entrepreneurial ecosystems in Bulgaria and Romania: A comparative analysis

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22154
Date01 September 2020
AuthorJames P. Hess
Published date01 September 2020
VIEW FROM PRACTICE
Entrepreneurial ecosystems in Bulgaria and Romania:
A comparative analysis
James P. Hess
Department of Management & Marketing,
Purdue University at Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne,
Indiana
Correspondence
James P. Hess, Department of Management &
Marketing, Purdue University at Fort Wayne,
2101 Coliseum Blvd. Neff 340R, Fort Wayne,
IN 46805.
Email: hessjp@pfw.edu
Abstract
This comparative analysis examines the neighboring entrepreneurial ecosystems in
Bulgaria and Romania. In transitioning from past planned economies, these countries
maintain similar approaches to entrepreneurship, yet they also exhibit distinct differ-
ences. Secondary data analysis revealed that both countries maintain a highly edu-
cated workforce with high start-up skills and similar levels of global competitiveness
in growing economies, while still facing low-risk acceptance and low opportunity per-
ception. On the other hand, Bulgaria excels in networking, building joint venture
deals, attracting investment, maintaining a stronger focus on R&D, and the ability to
nurture collaboration between industries and universities, while Romania displays
stronger political stability, greater ease in starting a business, a more advanced infra-
structure, and easier access to credit. As these countries capture the strengths of
their respective economies, both Bulgaria and Romania may one day represent pow-
erful hubs of innovation. Organizational leaders may use this study as a comparative
springboard to learn new, yet workable policies that may support entrepreneurship
within their respective ecosystems.
1|INTRODUCTION
The advent of entrepreneurial ecosystems has changed the dynamics
of the global business landscape, fueling shifts in knowledge, talent,
and other resources as diverse entities work interdependently toward
new, sustainable innovations. Within the last two decades, such hubs
of entrepreneurial activity have emerged in myriad locations around
the globe (Mack & Mayer, 2016). From Silicon Valley to London, Syd-
ney, Berlin, Southeast Asia, and beyond, entrepreneurial ecosystems
each comprised of unique political, socioeconomic, and organizational
factors have surfaced as strategic systems of innovation igniting mar-
ket leverage in each respective region (Audretsch & Belitski, 2017).
Entrepreneurial ecosystems are constantly evolving, each operating in
fundamentally different ways. Thus, the ecosystems cannot be
defined uniformly (Brown & Mason, 2017). In fact, each entrepreneur-
ial ecosystem is comprised of distinctive forces that build and sustain
regional entrepreneurial activity. According to Isenberg (2014) and
Roundy, Bradshaw, and Brockman (2018), no single catalyst drives the
success of entrepreneurial ecosystems, each being a self-regulating
network comprised of many interdependent players. Yet, with entre-
preneurship as the fundamental concept behind the entrepreneurial
ecosystem, a contextual framework arises that determines who
becomes an entrepreneur, to what extent entrepreneurial decision
making is supported, and how various factors impact entrepreneurial
outcomes (Autio, Kenney, Mustar, Siegel, & Wright, 2014). According
to Linan, Urbano, and Guerrero (2011), underlying beliefs about entre-
preneurship in general influence entrepreneurial players' desires to
support it. What results is a synergistic relationship whereby dynamic
interactivity among entrepreneurial players produces more than the
sum of their parts (Cooke, 2016). As entrepreneurial ecosystems react
to market conditions and players' actions, success is derived from sev-
eral key factors, including talent, entrepreneurial culture, the density
of researchers, access to markets, access to financial and human capi-
tal, and a supportive regulatory environment (Jha, 2018; Oh, Phillips,
Park, & Lee, 2016). Contemporary researchers continue to capture
the essence behind evolving entrepreneurial ecosystems to identify
new approaches to innovation and meaningful shifts in global business
patterns.
DOI: 10.1002/tie.22154
Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev.. 2020;62:489501. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tie © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. 489

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT