Enhancing China's Innovation Performance: The Policy Choices

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2014.12061.x
AuthorXiaolan Fu,Rongping Mu
Published date01 March 2014
Date01 March 2014
42 China & World Economy / 4260, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2014
©2014 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Enhancing Chinas Innovation Performance:
The Policy Choices
Xiaolan Fu, Rongping Mu*
Abstract
Transforming China into an innovation-driven economy has been one of the top priorities of
the Chinese Government. This paper examines the policy choices involved in the extended
national innovation performance framework for creating an open innovation system.
Innovation capabilities, incentives and institutional frameworks are examined. The paper
argues that China should continue to increase its investment in R&D and in education, and
that there should also be an attempt to strengthen the incentive system at the macro, meso
and micro levels. This strengthening may include reforms to: release the power of competition
and guide resources towards innovative sectors; adopt appropriate human resource
management, such as appraisal and remuneration systems; create effective policies for
research funding management; and evaluate the efficiency of research to encourage the
creativity of researchers, managers and employees. The paper also discusses the space for
industrial policy in the 21st century.
Key words: China, innovation, policy
JEL codes: O2, O3, P4
I. Introduction
After more than 30 years of economic reforms and having transformed from a low to a
middle income country, China now faces significant challenges in moving from imitation
to innovation. The success of this transformation will be of crucial importance for China
to avoid the middle-income trap and sustain its long-term economic growth (Wu, 2013).
*Xiaolan Fu, Professor and Director, Technology and Management for Development Centre, Oxford University,
Oxford, UK. Email: xiaolan.fu@qeh.ox.ac.uk; Rongping Mu, Professor and Director, Institute for Policy and
Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Email: mrp@casipm.ac.cn. The authors would like to
thank an anonymous referee, John Knight, Jinglian Wu, Wei Lv, Xin Fang, Mingjie Ma, Erniu Xuan, Guisheng Wu,
Jin Chen and Jizhen Li, as well as conference and seminar participants at the Oxford China Policy Forum, the
Academy of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Annual Conference, Tsinghua University and the Centre of
Development Research of the State Council for helpful and constructive comments.
43
Enhancing Chinas Innovation Performance
©2014 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
The past decade has seen an exponential increase in research and development (R&D)
investment in China. Developing an innovation-driven economy in the coming decades is a
major objective for China. Although there are many research papers and government reports
concerning national innovation capabilities in China, most of them address this problem
using the national innovation system (NIS) approach (e.g. Chen and Liu, 2008; OECD, 2008;
MOST, 2010; Wu, 2010; Mu and Fan, 2011). The NIS framework is powerful in mapping out
the major players in the innovation system and allows policy-makers to identify the objects
for policy intervention, but it does not explain how to increase the capabilities of players and
strengthen the linkages between them. The question of how to enhance the innovation
capabilities and performance of the country requires in-depth and systematic analysis.
The present paper examines policy choices for the development of innovation
capabilities in China using the national innovation performance (NIP) framework developed
by the OECD (1987) and Lall (1992), and modified and extended by Fu (2014). The importance
of policy in enhancing national innovation performance vis-à-vis simply leaving it to the
market is validated by several factors. First, given the nature of knowledge as a public good
and the prevalence of externalities that may benefit other users of knowledge, government
intervention is required to protect R&D investors and to encourage innovation activities.
Second, innovation is risky and costly. Therefore, there is a need for government financial
support to enable active innovation activities, especially in basic research where uncertainty
is high, because it is difficult to control the direction of the development of a technology
and the cost of failure of an experiment is high. Third, the presence of market failure caused
by problems such as information asymmetries, externalities of knowledge and public
goods also calls for policy intervention in information and knowledge provision. Finally,
China is being forced towards a more skill-intensive and technology-intensive growth
path, with the amount of surplus unskilled labor in China falling. This transformation can
be realized through the operation of market forces, but long-sightedness by firms and
government intervention are also required because of the long gestation periods involved.
The present paper is organized as follows. Section II provides a brief overview of the
innovation performance of China. Section III discusses the theoretical framework concerning
the determinants of NIP. Section IV analyzes the policy choices for boosting innovation
performance in China. Section V examines the space for innovation policy in the 21st
century. Section VI concludes.
II. Chinas Innovation Performance: An Overview
In the present paper innovation concerns not only novel innovations but also innovation

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT