Does XBRL help improve data processing efficiency?

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-07-2021-0155
Published date29 October 2021
Date29 October 2021
Pages47-60
Subject MatterAccounting & finance,Accounting/accountancy,Accounting methods/systems
AuthorYanchao Rao,Ken Huijin Guo
Does XBRL help improve data
processing eciency?
Yanchao Rao
School of Accountancy, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,
Shanghai, China, and
Ken Huijin Guo
College of Business and Economics, California State University,
Fullerton, Fullerton, California, USA
Abstract
Purpose The US Securities andExchange Commission (SEC) requires public companiesto le structured
data in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL). One of the key arguments behind the XBRL
mandate is that the technical standard can help improve processing efciency for data aggregators. This
paper aims to empiricallytest the data processing efciency hypothesis.
Design/methodology/approach To test the data processingefciency hypothesis, the authors adopt a
two-sample research design by using data from Compustat: a pooled sample (N=61,898) and a quasi-
experimental sample (N=564). The authors measure data processingefciency as the time lag between the
dates of 10-K lings on the SECs EDGAR system and the dates of related datanalized in the Compustat
database.
Findings The statisticalresults show that after controllingfor potential effects of rm size, age, scal year
and industry, XBRL has a non-signicant impact on data efciency. It suggests that the data processing
efciencybenet may have been overestimated.
Originality/value This study provides some timely empirical evidence to the debate as to whether
XBRL can improvedata processing efciency. The non-signicantresults suggest that it may be necessary to
revisitthe mandate of XBRL reporting in the USA and many other countries.
Keywords XBRL, Data aggregation, Data processing efciency
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) as a nancial reporting technical
standard has been adopted by morethan 50 countries around the world [1]. In the USA, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) started its XBRL reporting initiative around
2004 as a voluntary program and has since 2009 mandated public companies to use it in
their corporate disclosuressuch as annual reports (10-K). The adoption of XBRLis expected
to benet companies, investors and government agencies in terms of data processing and
information dissemination (SEC, 2004;SEC, 2009). Overall, the accounting and nance
literature has reported mixed ndings about the expected benets of the XBRL standard
(Perdana et al.,2015,2019).
One particular benet cited by the SEC is the expected improvement of processing
efciency by data aggregators (SEC, 2009).However, beyond the conjectures and comments
that the SEC relied upon, therehas been surprisingly little empirical evidence to support that
Data Availability: Data is obtained from public sources identied in the paper.
Data
processing
eciency
47
Received28 July 2021
Revised29 September 2021
Accepted12 October 2021
InternationalJournal of
Accounting& Information
Management
Vol.30 No. 1, 2022
pp. 47-60
© Emerald Publishing Limited
1834-7649
DOI 10.1108/IJAIM-07-2021-0155
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/1834-7649.htm

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT