Do Mother and Father Auditors Have Equal Prospects for Career Advancement?

AuthorCarolyn Windsor,Rikke Holmslykke Kristensen,Pamela Kent,Bent Warming‐Rasmussen
Date01 March 2017
Published date01 March 2017
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12074
Do Mother and Father Auditors Have Equal Prospects for Career Advancement?
Rikke Holmslykke Kristensen,
1
Pamela Kent,
2
Bent Warming-Rasmussen
1
and Carolyn Windsor
3
1
Department of Entrepreneurshipand Relationship Management,University of Southern, Denmark
2
Adelaide Business School, University of Adelaide
3
Independent researcher
This research investigates whether parental role and gender are associated with career advancement for professional
female and maleauditors employed by internationalaudit firms in Denmark. Managementat four levels, from partner
to lower level non-management employee, areexamined to determine whether a relationship holds between being a
parent and gender. We find thatmore parents achieve advancement to higher levelsof employment than non-parents.
However, mothers are significantly disadvantaged relativeto fathers in achieving senior levels of employment. There
is no significant difference in the likelihood of career advancement between female and male auditors that are not
parents implied by a lack of significant resultsfor the gender variable in the regression analyses. Years of experience
also significantly explains careeradvancement in the organizationwhile age is significantlycorrelated with experience
of the auditor.
Key words: Auditorscareer advancement, parent, gender egalitarianism, female parent
1. INTRODUCTION
We examine whether mothers and fathers have equal
prospects for career advancement in large audit firms in
Denmark. Denmark is an interesting country to study
because it values genderegalitarianism, evidenced by state
and institutional support for families with children in the
workplace(House & Javidan, 2004). However,it is possible
that the social aim of gender egalitarianism in Denmark is
symbolic and not achieved in practical outcomes. The
European Commissions research project Women to the Top
(Jämställdhetsombudsmannen, 2005) investigates the
gender imbalance in management ranks at the executive
level (directorsand chief executive officers, CEOs) because
this is the most male-dominated category in the European
workforce. This research reports that only 4 per cent of
the CEOs and 7 per cent of the board members in Danish
private companies are women. Similar results apply to
the public sector. Denmark has the highest female activity
rate/labour market participation in the world,
1
although
there appears to be a lack of female managers in
Denmark. We provide evidence on the issue of gender
egalitarianism defined as the societal institutionalization
of gender equality (Gornick & Meyers, 2008) for large
accounting firms in Denmark with a particular emphasis
on the career outcomes for mothers and fathers.
We add to research conducted in the Swedish audit
industry that investigates gender-based career differences
and childcare (Månsson, Elg & Jonnergård, 2013). We
specificallyexamine the impact of being a mother or father
in Denmarkrather than examining thegender of the person
that cares for the children. We also contribute to a
deficiency in gender research (Kornberger, Carter &
Ross-Smith 2010) by introducing social cultural theories to
add theory and knowledge to gender research in accounting.
The study is important for three reasons. First, gender
equality at all levels in the workplace is seen as vital for
womens fair access to social, economic, cultural and
political affluence and influence. The reality is that
discriminationstill exists and affectswomen in many ways,
including theirlack of advancement to seniormanagement
in spite of decades of national and international
commitment to gender equality (Gornick & Meyers, 2003;
International Labour Office, 2009; England, 2010). The
interaction in the workplace between women and men,
including their socially constructed gender roles and
biological differences, is fundamental to effective work
(International Labour Office, 2009). The International
Labour Office (2009) articulates two reasons why sex
discrimination should be eliminated in the workplace and
home. The first reason is a rights-based perspective that
asserts that discrimination against women at work is a
matter of fundamental human rights and justice. The
second reason is an economic-efficiency rationale that
recognizesthe critical role women play as economic agents
assisting economic growth and poverty reduction
(International Labour Office, 2009).
Second, the study is important to the accounting
profession in Denmark and other countries. In 2003, the
Danish Institute of State-Authorized Public Accountants
established a Committee on Female Career Advancement
to provide solutions to overcome the lack of female audit
partners in Danish audit firms. Their report reflected the
committees concern about promoting more females from
the Master of Accounting degree level to the higher
managerial levels, including partnership (Foreningen af
Statsautoriserede Revisorer (FSR), 2004). The accounting
profession publicly maintains a goal of achieving gender
equality in the workplace (Kornberger et al., 2010).
Third, behavioural differencesbetween women and men
have important inferences for the quality of auditing and
financial reporting (Ittonen, Vähämaa & Vähämaa, 2013).
Previousresearch indicatesthat females perform differently
to males in audit and business outcomes, and that it adds
value to have a balance of female and male auditors.
Evidence from a sample of public firms in Finland,
Denmark and Swedenshows that audits with female audit
engagement partners have significantly higher audit fees.
One of the explanations suggested is that female partners
tolerate less risk, leading to increased audit effort (Ittonen
& Peni, 2012). Research from a sample of Finnish and
Swedish listed companies also found that companies
audited by female audit engagement partners had smaller
abnormal accruals. This implies that female auditors
restrain earnings management (Ittonen et al., 2013).
Correspondenceto: Pamela Kent, Adelaide Business School, University of
Adelaide.E-mail: pamela.kent@adelaide.edu.au
International Journal of Auditing doi: 10.1111/ijau.12074
Int. J. Audit. 21:110(2017)
©2016 John Wiley& Sons Ltd ISSN 1090-6738

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT