Coordination of a two‐echelon supply chain in presence of market segmentation, credit payment, and quantity discount policies

Published date01 July 2019
AuthorMahsa Noori‐Daryan,Ata Allah Taleizadeh,Naghmeh Rabiei
Date01 July 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12618
Intl. Trans. in Op. Res. 26 (2019) 1576–1605
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12618
INTERNATIONAL
TRANSACTIONS
IN OPERATIONAL
RESEARCH
Coordination of a two-echelon supply chain in presence
of market segmentation, credit payment, and quantity
discount policies
Ata Allah Taleizadeha, Naghmeh Rabieiband Mahsa Noori-Daryana
aSchool of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran11155-4563, Iran
bDepartment of Industrial Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
E-mail: taleizadeh@ut.ac.ir [Taleizadeh];naghmeh724rbk@gmail.com [Rabiei];
m.nooridaryan@ut.ac.ir [Noori-Daryan]
Received 27 March 2018; receivedin revised form 1 November 2018; accepted 12 November 2018
Abstract
In today’s competitive business markets, a revenue optimization method is always one of the most crucial
issues ahead of commercial supply chains so that it is utilized by the managers to improve their profitability.
On the other hand, enhancing coordination and collaborationbetween the chains’ members has taken a vital
role in increasing their efficiency and profitability. Thus, managers tend to employ/design marketing and
coordinating incentive mechanisms using the revenue optimization method, as the most influential tools, to
motivate the purchasersto order more and subsequently increase their market share. Here,this issue is studied
in a two-echelon supply chain by designing incentivecontracts in order to evaluate the profit of organizations
and enterprises and assess the best contract, which causes the highest profit,as the main goal of the businesses.
In this study, a pricing-inventory model is developed for a single-item two-echelon supply chain consisting
of a manufacturer and a retailer in the presence of three different scenarios. In the first scenario, a credit
payment (delay-in-payment) contract is considered between the chain members. In the second scenario, we
studied a market segmentation policy in which the market demand is divided into price and quality oriented
customers’ demand while a quantity discount contract is assumed as the third one. The profit of supply chain
under these new conditions is computed by some numerical examples and then the effectsof cost parameters
on the decision variables and the profit are analyzed.
Keywords:pricing; market segmentation; delay-in-payment; quantity discount; quality; supply chain
1. Introduction and literature review
In this section, first, an introduction of main streams is presented and the motivation of this study
is stated. Then, related literature is reviewed to show the gap in research.
C
2018 The Authors.
International Transactionsin Operational Research C
2018 International Federation ofOperational Research Societies
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA02148,
USA.
A. A. Taleizadeh et al. / Intl. Trans. in Op. Res.26 (2019) 1576–1605 1577
1.1. Background and motivation
Considering the fact that companies and businesses are strenuously competing and struggling
to survive in this competitive atmosphere, employing new techniques and policies can be useful
for them to stay one step ahead of their rivals and be able to follow their goals. Designing
and utilizing contracts is one tried and tested means to help managers to accomplish their
plans. Hence, in this study not only are coordinating contracts applied, but also those that are
designed to show that managers can adjust contract parameters based on their own loss and
profit.
Although there are many effective contracts, in this study, we try to employsome contracts, which
are practical for all members faced with lack of liquidity or high inflationrate. Therefore,these three
contracts are employed: delay in payment, market segmentation, and quantity discount. Here, the
attractive and convincing contracts are considered to encourage members of supply chains in order
to use these contracts in their businesses. Under delay in payment contracts, manufacturers and
retailers who encounter financial problems can help each other to increase their profitability. The
manufacturer, by proposing this contract to the retailer, can increase the sales rate. On the other
hand, the retailer does not have to pay the selling costs at that moment and can delay payments.
In market segmentation the manufacturer and the retailer are aware that they have to satisfy two
groups of customers and all customers cannot afford to buy all kinds of products. Therefore, under
this contract they not only meet both groups’ demands but also raise the sales rate and profitability.
And in the last scenario, quantity discount is employed to show that manufacturers and retailers
can achieve profit even with financial problems, because the manufacturer can increase the sales
rate and the retailer can pay the purchasing costs at lower prices. As mentioned above, by using
incentive contracts, partners can help each other to improve their performance and reduce their
costs, especially in challenging and critical circumstances.
1.2. Litera ture review
Maximizing profits or minimizing costs as the main purpose of organizations and business compa-
nies is the most important factor in increasing competition among firms and supply chains so that
organizations and companies in competitive business ceaselessly try to extend their activities and
also increase their profit byapplying different strategies of inventory, manufacturing,and marketing.
For example, Sarkar (2012) reviewedan Economic Manufacturing Quantity (EMQ) model in which
the demand rate depends on advertising and price. In this model, the effect of inflation was studied
and costs of development, material, and production are used as reliability parameters. Taleizadeh
et al. (2015) studied a three-level supply chain: a distributor, a manufacturer, and a retailer and
they determined the selling prices of the supplier, the distributor, and the retailer. Therefore, the
total profit of each member was optimized. Taleizadeh and Noori-Daryan (2015a) developed their
model in a three-echelon supply chain containing multiple suppliers, a manufacturer, and multiple
retailers producing multiple items under decentralized structures. They also optimized the chain’s
profit under these two structures. In addition to this research, they considered a three-level supply
network and they minimized total costs of the chain by applying a Stackelberg–Nash equilibrium
(Taleizadeh and Noori-Daryan, 2015b).
C
2018 The Authors.
International Transactionsin Operational Research C
2018 International Federation of OperationalResearch Societies

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT