Comment on “Instability in Europe and its Impact on Asia”
Published date | 01 July 2018 |
Author | Sayuri Shirai |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12225 |
Date | 01 July 2018 |
Comment on “Instability in Europe and its
Impact on Asia”
Sayuri SHIRAI†
Keio University
JEL codes: F02, N14, N15
Accepted: 24 February 2018
Kaji (2018) focuses on the dilemmas driven by European integration. While the
European Union has enjoyed substantial benefits generated through economic integra-
tion, the integration has given rise to three unintended consequences: (i) growing anti-
integration sentiments and BREXIT; (ii) skepticism about the benefits of the free mar-
kets (especially migration); and (iii) enhanced protection of incumbents (regular
workers) vis-a-vis nonregular workers in the process of promoting the welfare state.
These consequences resulted in pessimism, but the public mood has become more posi-
tive since 2017 thanks to the limited breakthrough of “populism”in the elections con-
ducted in the Netherland and France. It is my view that anti-integration modes are
likely to attenuate in the foreseeable future due to a series of new developments –the
integration initiatives under French President Emmanuel Macron, Macron’s good rela-
tionship with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the German Social Democratic Party’s
pro-European views, as well as growing criticism in Europe against protectionism and
the anti-immigration motions under US President Donald Trump’s leadership.
If the Franco-German initiative fails, I agree with Kaji’s assessment that it would
deter sustainable economic growth in Europe. However, the impact of the failure on
the Asian economy might be limited contrary to Kaji’s view. This is because Asia is the
fastest growing region in the world and economic/financial integration within Asia has
been rapidly taking place. Kaji could have elaborated more thoroughly on how Europe
and Asia have become connected not only through trade linkages, but also through
financial linkages. For example, Asian capital markets have enjoyed substantial capital
inflows from Europe especially after the global financial crisis. Kaji (2018) would also
have benefited from having paid greater attention to the growing role of China in
deepening Asia–Europe integration. The presence of China has risen due to China’s
growing economic size; rapidly growing financial markets; the One Belt One Road and
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) initiatives; and various efforts by China’s
government to deepen financial integration with the world and Europe (such as RMB
currency swap arrangements, the establishment of RMB clearing banks, and the
†Correspondence: Sayuri Shirai, Faculty of Policy Management, Keio University, 5322 Endo
Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-0882, Japan. Email: sshirai@sfc.keio.ac.jp
260 © 2018 Japan Center for Economic Research
doi: 10.1111/aepr.12225 Asian Economic Policy Review (2018) 13, 260–261
To continue reading
Request your trial