Comment on “How does the Price Regulation Policy Impact on Patient–Nurse Ratios and the Length of Hospital Stays in Japanese Hospitals?”

Published date01 July 2015
AuthorToshiaki Iizuka
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12111
Date01 July 2015
Comment on “How does the Price
Regulation Policy Impact on Patient–Nurse
Ratios and the Length of Hospital Stays in
Japanese Hospitals?”
Toshiaki IIZUKA†
University of Tokyo
JEL codes: I11, I18
It is well known that Japan has the longest average length of hospital stays (LHS) for
inpatient care among all countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation
Development (OECD). According to OECD Health Statistics, LHS in Japan was 24.8 in
2000, while the OECD average in the same year was only 8.3. Having noticed this long
LHS, since the late 1980s, the Japanese government has implemented a series of policies
that aim to lower the patient–nurse ratio (PNR) and shorten LHS. Noguchi (2015)
studies the impacts of these policy interventions on PNR and LHS. This is a timely study
as the government is now further introducing new policies that could drastically alter the
way that inpatient services are provided in Japan. In particular, the government intro-
duced a new 7:1 ward system in 2006, and as of 2013 more than 40% of general hospital
beds had adopted the new 7:1 payment. Given the rapid spread of this new payment, it is
important to examine whether the impact of the new payment differed from previous
interventions.
Although there is room for improvement, overall, I find Noguchi’s (2015) paper
interesting and stimulating. In particular, it nicely documents the long-term trend of the
key variables of the Japanese health-care system, such as LHS and PNR for inpatient care.
Moreover, as I discuss in detail below, Noguchi made a great attempt to identify the
causal impact of policy changes. I see this paper as being an important first step to fully
investigate the impact of the policy interventions that affect the production of inpatient
services.
Noguchi assembled a unique hospital-level dataset, combining two large data
obtained from the government. To identify the impact of policy changes, Noguchi
focused on the changes in inpatient payments implemented in 2000 and 2006. As
Noguchi noted, identifying the causal impact of a health policy is often difficult in
Japan because it is common that a health policy affects all hospitals and thus no clear
control group exists. In her econometric model, Noguchi attempted to overcome this
difficulty by combining the propensity score matching and the difference-in-difference
approaches. For example, for the 2006 policy changes, the government increased the
†Correspondence: Toshiaki Iizuka, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongyo,
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. Email: toshi.iizuka@gmail.com
bs_bs_banner
doi: 10.1111/aepr.12111 Asian Economic Policy Review (2015) 10, 326–327
© 2015 Japan Center for Economic Research326

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT