Circular economy business models in developing economies: Lessons from India on reduce, recycle, and reuse paradigms

AuthorMark Esposito,Sandeep Goyal,Amit Kapoor
Date01 September 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21883
Published date01 September 2018
COMPANIES IN THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY
Circular economy business models in developing economies:
Lessons from India on reduce, recycle, and reuse paradigms
Sandeep Goyal
1
| Mark Esposito
2,3
| Amit Kapoor
1
1
Institute for Competitiveness, Gurgaon, India
2
Division of Continuing Education, Harvard
University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
3
Grenoble Ecole de Management, Grenoble,
France
Correspondence
Sandeep Goyal, Institute for Competitiveness,
U 24/8, DLF Phase 3, Gurgaon 122 002,
Haryana, India.
Email: sandy2u@gmail.com
According to the UN Sustainable Development Goals in 2016, the demand for resources will
require natural resources equivalent to two and three planets by 2030 and 2050, respectively.
The linear economic model driven by a take-make-disposephilosophy is unable to manage the
demand and supply balance in consumption of natural resources. This imbalance is affecting the
sustainability of the countries and enterprises as well as affecting the global supply chain leading
to socioeconomic and environmental risks and volatility. Realizing the future resource scarcity
challenge, the current linear economy model is giving way to the circular economy model. The
circular economy model focuses on careful alignment and management of resource flows across
the value chain by integrating reverse logistics, design innovation, collaborative ecosystem, and
business model innovation. This article examines how circular model is pushing the companies
in developing economies like India to design and implement business models that are based on
reduce, reuse, and recycle paradigms.
KEYWORDS
business models, circular economy, cradle-to-cradle, cradle-to-grave, developing economies,
linear economy, reduce-reuserecycle
1|INTRODUCTION
The global demandsupply curve is showing trends of caution with
the increasing gap between growing demand and finite resources.
The growing demand and competition for limited resources are lead-
ing to price volatility, resulting in environmental degradation and
threatening the competitiveness of countries (Di Maio & Rem,
2015). The resource pressure is increasing, due to the multitude of
reasons. The first reason being that world population will exceed
8 billion by 2030 and 9 billion by 2050 (EMF, 2013; Tse, Esposito, &
Soufani, 2015). This population growth level implies that the
demand for resources will require two and three planets' worth of
natural resources by 2030 and 2050, respectively (Esposito, Tse, &
Soufani, 2015a). The second reason is attributed to the linear econ-
omy model, which is driven by the cradle-to-gravephilosophy. The
linear orientation implies a single-use lifestyle motivated by a take-
make-disposeapproach toward consumption of resources (Ellen
MacArthur Foundation [EMF], 2013; World Economic Forum [WEF],
2014). The linear economy model is driven by the core premise of
balance and equilibrium between demand and supply of one planet,
whereas demand is expected to reach two planets' worth of
resources by 2030.
This upcoming reality questions the basic premise of linear econ-
omy model followed by the countries and businesses globally. The
third reason is attributed to the variations and complexities regarding
policies, priorities, and regulations among different countries. The
sociocultural and economic diversity, as well as psychological behavior
and resistance to change from a use-and-throw mind-set, have made
it difficult to design and implement a global change and action plan to
drive the transformation from linear to circular economy model. The
fourth reason points at the demographic shift happening regarding
the concentration of population across countries. According to Haub
(2012), the majority of the population resides in developing countries.
By 2050, the developing countries will account for more than 90% of
the world's people (Figure 1). The concentration of population in less
developed countries poses a significant challenge and need for sys-
temic intervention because the concept of circular economy is rather
new for the developing countries as compared to the developed coun-
tries. The adoption of circular economy approach in developing coun-
tries requires a long-term systemic behavior change orientation for all
DOI: 10.1002/tie.21883
Thunderbird Int Bus Rev. 2018;60:729740. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tie © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 729

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT