Challenges and opportunities for gender-affirming healthcare for transgender women in prison

Date13 March 2017
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-08-2016-0046
Published date13 March 2017
Pages32-40
AuthorJae Sevelius,Valerie Jenness
Subject MatterHealth & social care,Criminology & forensic psychology,Prisoner health,Sociology,Sociology of crime & law,Public policy & environmental management,Policing,Criminal justice
Challenges and opportunities for
gender-affirming healthcare for
transgender women in prison
Jae Sevelius and Valerie Jenness
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to briefly address three interrelated areas of concerns victimization,
housing placement and healthcare provision related to the health and welfare of transgender women in jails,
prisons and other types of detention facilities.
Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a growing body of research on health risks for transgender
women who are detained in facilities in California and elsewhere, the authors provide recommendations for
policy and practice that constitutes gender-affirming healthcare for transgender women behind bars.
Findings Policymakers, correctional leaders, and prison-based clinicians have a number of opportunities
to address the welfare of transgender women in jails, prisons and other types of detention facilities.
Originality/value This policy brief offers concrete steps government officials can take to better meet their
professional and constitutional obligations, provide higher quality care for transgender women involved in the
criminal justice system, and effectuate positive changes in transgender womens health and welfare both
inside and outside of carceral environments.
Keywords Health in prison, Correctional healthcare, Health policy, Human rights, Women prisoners,
Transgender
Paper type Viewpoint
Introduction
Transgender people challenge one of the most basic assumptions of incarceration:
segregation by sex , with sex (and corre sponding gender id entity) meaning m ale and female
(and only male and female). Transgender people problematize the taken-for-gran ted status of
sex-segregated d etention facilit ies as a routine poli cy commitment and operat ional practice
because their gend er identity and/or g ender expression d o not align with the se x they
were assigned at birth (see Box 1). Transgender peoples gender expression may or may not
align with their gender identity and often varies depending on their desire for and access to
transition-rel ated healthcare, s uch as hormones and s urgeries; this in tu rn, results in
challenges to long-standing classification systems in corrections. The binary system of
classification has created a multitude of complications when it comes to caring for transgender
people in contemporary correctional settings, including providing high-quality healthcare. In
this historical co ntext, transgend er people in some jur isdictions techni cally have legal
protection against discrimination, but they nonetheless confront significant threats to health
and welfare as detainees, jailers and prisoners.
Transgender individuals are more likely than the general population to experience multiple forms
of violence across the life spanand [t]hey are less likely to receive adequate medical and
criminal justice interventions when this victimization occurs(Witten and Eyler, 1999, p. 464; see
also Lombardi et al., 2001). With this in mind, we focus empirical, analytic and policy attention on
transgender women who are subject to state control. Recognizing that transgender men also
comprise an important population of concern, we focus on transgender women because
Received 28 August 2016
Revised 7 December 2016
22 December 2016
Accepted 5 January 2017
The authors want to thank the
University of California Justice and
Health Consortium for inviting the
authors to write this policy brief.
This brief has benefitted from
feedback provided by members of
the Consortium, especially Brie
Williams, Megan Comfort and
Danielle Castro. The drafting of this
manuscript has been supported in
part by Award No. R34DA038541
(PI: Sevelius) from the National
Institute on Drug Abuse at the
National Institutes of Health.
Jae Sevelius is based at the
University of California,
San Francisco, San Francisco,
California, USA.
Valerie Jenness is based at the
University of California, Irvine,
Irvine, California, USA.
PAG E 32
j
INTERNATIONALJOURNAL OF PRISONER HEALTH
j
VOL. 13 NO. 1 2017, pp. 32-40, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1744-9200 DOI 10.1108/IJPH-08-2016-0046

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT