Can Cultural Affinity Promote Trade ? HSK Test Data from the Belt and Road Countries

Published date01 May 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12245
AuthorMengjun Xie
Date01 May 2018
©2018 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
China & World Economy / 109–126, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2018
109
*Mengjun Xie, Associate Professor, College of International Education, Shandong Technology and Business
University, China. Email: mjxie3@163.com. The author thanks the Chinese Testing International Limited
Company for the data. This study is supported by the Shandong Natural Science Fund (No. ZR2018QG004)
and the Shandong Social Science Fund (Nos. 18CGLJ44 and 15CGLJ19).
Can Cultural Anity Promote Trade ?
HSK Test Data from the Belt and Road Countries
Mengjun Xie*
Abstract
As Chinese culture is “going out,” more and more non-native Chinese speakers are
beginning to study Mandarin and are taking the Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi (HSK) test.
Mandarin has become a very important trade language for the Belt and Road countries.
This paper uses the dierence-in-dierence model and the Mahalanobis distance and the
nearest neighbor distance matching methods to study the internal relationship between
culture “going out” and foreign trade. We find that cultural affinity is an important
factor in promoting trade, and that the HSK project has expanded China’s exports to
the Belt and Road countries. Culture’s promotion eect in Asia is stronger than that in
Europe. Culture’s promotion eect shows the characteristics of regional dierences, a
time-lag and a uctuating upward trend. Therefore, further enhancing the international
inuence of its culture would help China to nd a new source of export growth.
Key words: Belt and Road Initiative, dierence-in-dierence model, export, HSK
JEL codes: E61, F15, F41
I. Introduction
The “going out” development strategy, which was proposed in 2000, is an important
component of China’s opening-up policy. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is the
contemporary and specific “going out” strategy involved. Since it was proposed, it
has received considerable attention and recognition from the international community,
and has injected a new vitality into the leapfrogging development of China’s exports.
The concept of the BRI is derived from the ancient Silk Road, and this strategy was
ocially proposed by China in October 2013. Specically, we are referring to the Silk
Road Economic Belt and the 21st-century Maritime Silk Road. The strategy aims to
Mengjun Xie / 109–126, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2018
©2018 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
110
strengthen cultural communication among countries, and to promote economic and trade
cooperation and regional economic growth. At present, the BRI includes 65 countries,1
comprising 63 percent of the world’s population and 29 percent of the world’s economic
aggregate. Since ancient times, China and the countries along the BRI have maintained
friendly cultural communication and good trade relations. Today, the BRI is a very
important trade conduit for China.
With the sustained and rapid economic growth, China’s merchandise export
volume reached US$209.76bn in 2016 (NBS, 2017), so that China has continually
ranked as the world’s largest exporter of goods. At the same time, China’s culture
going out has developed rapidly. Increasing numbers of people have begun
to study Mandarin and take the Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi (HSK) test, which is an
international standardized test of Chinese language prociency for non-native Chinese
speakers. According to the data from Hanban (the ocial organizer of HSK), there
are 1066 HSK test centers in 125 countries, and more than 6 million people took
various Chinese tests in 2016.2 Around 21,000 candidates sat the examination for the
International Chinese Language Teacher Certificate of Qualification. According to
the data from Chinese Testing International Limited Company, more than 1 million
people from 49 countries along the Belt and Road took the HSK test in 2016. The
HSK has played an important role for cultural communication among Asian, European
and African countries. As noted, the Belt and Road is an important conduit of China’s
exports and cultural communication, and provides many potential trade partners
to China. Culture “going out” and commodity “going out” are both very important
components of China’s “going out” strategy. Are there some internal relationships
between them? Can culture affinity promote trade? Does the increasing number of
HSK candidates promote China’s exports to countries along the Belt and Road?
Much of the published literature analyzes the impacts of economic, political,
geographical and other traditional factors on exports. Very few study the impact of
culture on exports from the perspective of economics. New institutional economists view
culture as an important part of the informal institution; it has an important inuence on
trade. Various global and regional trade cooperation agreements have made tari and
1The 65 countries include Afghanistan, Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bhutan,
Bosnia, Brunei, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech, Egypt, Estonia, Georgia, Greece, Hungary,
India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Laos, Lebanon, Lithuania,
Macedonia, Malaysia, Maldives, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Myanmar, Nepal, Oman, Pakistan,
Palestine, the Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia,
Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates,
Uzbekistan, Vietnam and Yemen.
2Data are available from: http://www.hanban.edu.cn/report/index.html.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT