A Business Analysis of Asian Baseball Leagues

Date01 January 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12121
Published date01 January 2016
AuthorYoung Hoon Lee,Hayley Jang
A Business Analysis of Asian Baseball
Leagues
Hayley JANG and Young Hoon LEE†
Sogang University
This study reviews previous research on sports economics and applied descriptive analyses to
derive policy recommendations for the Korean Baseball Organization and the Nippon Professional
Baseball. We discuss various aspects of the contemporary baseball business, and compare them
with the American Major League Baseball (MLB). One distinctive characteristic common to both
Asian leagues is the governance structure, where member teams are owned by major conglomer-
ates. We explore this characteristic to assess the business objectives of the Korean Baseball Organi-
zation and the Nippon Professional Baseball, and find that their sources of competitive balance
differ from those in MLB. Our conclusion suggests that their business objective should begin to
move slowly toward one similar to that of MLB, and safeguards should be implemented to main-
tain a reasonable competitive balance. We also conclude that sports diplomacy and the creation of
international competition are important because international competition and the success of
national teams are critical for fan demand.
Key words: attendance, baseball business, competitive balance, fan loyalty, governance structure,
revenue sharing
JEL codes: Z20, L83
1. Introduction
The Japanese Nippon Professional Baseball League (NPB) and the Korea Baseball Orga-
nization (KBO) are now the second and third largest professional baseball leagues in the
world in terms of revenue-generating ability, after Major League Baseball (MLB). Con-
siderable research has focused on these two Asian baseball leagues (La Croix & Kawaura,
1999; Lee, 2004, 2006; Lee & Smith, 2008; Yamamura, 2011; Leeds & Sakata, 2012; Fort
et al., 2015; Humphreys & Watanabe, 2015). Scholars have analyzed various issues. For
example, La Croix and Kawaura (1999) examined how changes to regulations in the
players’ labor market affected the competitive balance (CB) in the NPB. Based on an
“uncertainty of outcome” (UOH) hypothesis, Lee (2004) analyzed attendance in the
KBO, MLB, and NPB empirically and obtained heterogeneous results across the three
leagues. However, to date, no scholars have conducted a comprehensive analysis of the
similarities and differences between the three leagues. The three leagues are similar in
many ways. Each league draws the largest attendance among the country’s domestic
sports leagues. All three are closed leagues, in which there is no relegation or promotion.
Labor market regulations also include common factors of reserve clauses, salary arbitra-
tion, and free agency.
†Correspondence: Young Hoon Lee, Department of Economics, Sogang University, Sinsoo-dong
#1, Mapo-gu, Seoul 121-742, South Korea. Email: yhnlee@sogang.ac.kr
bs_bs_banner
doi: 10.1111/aepr.12121 Asian Economic Policy Review (2016) 11, 95–112
© 2016 Japan Center for Economic Research 95
However, the two Asian leagues have distinctive characteristics that differ from the
MLB. Governance structure is one difference: teams in the KBO and NPB are generally
owned by major conglomerates, while teams in the MLB are independent firms. This dif-
ference means that they may have different purposes in the baseball business. Generally,
teams in the KBO and NPB have negative profits, but their balance sheets show them as
breaking even because of cash injections from their parent companies. These baseball
businesses are heavily dependent on the business of the parent companies, and then on
their countries’ business cycles. The once fast-growing Japanese economy has experi-
enced long-term depression since the early 1990s. The Koreaneconomy also expanded its
scale and scope with aggressive investment, and enjoyed leverage effects until the eco-
nomic crisis of the late 1990s. The economic system used by Korean firms, involving
large debts and large investments, was vulnerable to exogenous financial shocks. Now,
these firms put more weight on economic stability and profits than fast growth. These
shifts in economic regimes reflect changes in the business environment that member
teams in the KBO and NPB must consider.
In this study, we review previous studies on sports economics and apply descriptive
analyses to examine various aspects of the contemporary baseball business. We compare
governance structures, business objectives, revenue determinants, CB, and fan loyalty
within the three leagues from a historical perspective. Our objective is to derive policy
recommendations for the KBO and NPB, where regime changes are currently in progress
or are expected in the near future.
Section 2 provides a brief historical review and discusses player labor market regula-
tions. Section 3 discusses governance structures and the baseball business model. Section
4 discusses the size of the professional baseball industries. Sections 5 and 6 compare CBs
and fan demand (in particular, fan loyalty and habitual attendance) in the three leagues,
respectively. Finally, Section 7 presents policy implications based on the findings.
2. Brief History
MLB is one of the four major team sports leagues in North America and it has the
longest history. The National League(NL) was established in 1876 and the cur rentleague
structure of the MLB was formed in 1901 with the official formation of the American
League (AL). Currently, there are 30 member teams and 162 games in a regular season.
In 1901, the annual league attendance and average attendance per games (APGs) were
3,603,615 and 3235, respectively. By 2014, those numbers had increased to 73,739,622
and 30,345, respectively, and their average annual growth rates have remained high, at
2.68% and 1.98%, respectively. The current labor union for MLB players, the Major
League Baseball Players Association, was founded in 1953, and played an important role
in the introduction of a free agent system in 1976. After playing for six seasons, players
can declare themselves as free agents. The MLB has adopted a salary cap in the manner
of a “luxury tax” to prevent teams in large markets from acquiring most of the talented
players, which helps maintain a reasonable CB.
Business of Asian Baseball Leagues Hayley Jang and Young Hoon Lee
© 2016 Japan Center for Economic Research96

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT