Banking sector stability and economic growth in post‐transition European Union countries

AuthorMarius Dan Gavriletea,Djula Borozan,Yilmaz Bayar
Published date01 January 2021
Date01 January 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1829
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Banking sector stability and economic growth
in post-transition European Union countries
Yilmaz Bayar
1
| Djula Borozan
2
| Marius Dan Gavriletea
3
1
Department of Economics, Faculty of
Economics and Administrative Sciences,
Usak University, Usak, Turkey
2
Faculty of Economics in Osijek, Josip
Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek,
Osijek, Croatia
3
Business Department, Faculty of
Business, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-
Napoca, Romania
Correspondence
Marius Dan Gavriletea, Business
Department, Faculty of Business, Babes-
Bolyai University, Str. Horea 7, Cluj-
Napoca, Romania.
Email: dan.gavriletea@tbs.ubbcluj.ro
Abstract
Economic growth is considered to be an essential means for poverty alleviation
and improving countries' well-being. Disturbances and instability in the bank-
ing sector may jeopardize financial stability and generate adverse, considerable
and long-lasting consequences therefor. This study analyzed the dynamic and
causal effects of various indicators of banking sector stability on economic
growth by employing new generation panel cointegration and causality tests in
post-transition European Union countries over the period 19982016. Taking
into account cross-sectional dependence between countries, the presence of
heterogeneity in the errors, endogeneity and structural breaks, the long and
short run analyses revealed the cointegration relation between the variables,
the statistically significant positive effect of banking sector stability on eco-
nomic growth and the efficiency of the error correction mechanism. The cau-
sality analysis disclosed the opposite causality direction between the particular
banking sector stability indicators and economic growth, suggesting that bank-
ing sector stability is a complex, hierarchically structured multidimensional
construct. Its different dimensions require different policy responses aiming at
preventing future shocks and mitigating the adverse effects, while encouraging
economic growth.
KEYWORDS
Banking sector stability, economic growth, panel cointegration and causality analysis, post-
transition EU countries, structural breaks
1|INTRODUCTION
The banking sector plays an important role in an econ-
omy. Hence, disturbances and instability in its operation
jeopardize financial stability and may have considerable
and long-lasting macroeconomic consequences (Mishkin,
2000). Their adverse consequences may be, for example, a
reduced power of monetary policy and deteriorated price
stability or an inefficient resource allocation through a
bad banking credit system and thus flaws in financing
investment and consumption. Aghion, Angeletos, Ban-
erjee, and Manova (2010) implicitly corroborated that
banking sector stability leads to economic stability
which is necessary for sustainable economic growth and
development. Consequently, central banks, supervisory
authorities and broader macroeconomic policy authori-
ties are particularly interested in assessing and monitor-
ing banking sector stability that may be defined as the
state in which the banking system is resistant to eco-
nomic shocks and ab le to meet its basic fu nctions.
A development of the banking sector across countries
differs based on multiple determinants such as macroeco-
nomic stability (Agenor & da Silva, 2012), human capital
(Perera, 2017), political stability and investor protection
Received: 15 March 2019 Revised: 4 October 2019 Accepted: 18 June 2020
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.1829
Int J Fin Econ. 2021;26:949961. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ijfe © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 949

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT