Advancements and forecasts of electronic tax return and informational filings in the US

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-06-2018-0072
Date07 May 2019
Published date07 May 2019
Pages352-371
AuthorKai S. Koong,Shuming Bai,Sara Tejinder,Charlotte Morris
Advancements and forecasts
of electronic tax return and
informational lings in the US
Kai S. Koong
Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, Alabama, USA
Shuming Bai
University of Texas of The Permian Basin, Odessa, Texas, USA, and
Sara Tejinder and Charlotte Morris
Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, Alabama, USA
Abstract
Purpose The US Congress set the original goal that 80 per cent of all tax returns should to be led
electronicallyfor the 2007 tax year. Unfortunately,only 70 per cent of the total returns were electronicallyled
(e-led) in 2017. This paper aims to examine the longitudinal progress of total tax returns e-led by
individuals, businesses and othercategories for the period from 2004 to 2017 and projects a timeline to
attain the goal.
Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive computationand analysis were performed for the
volume, ratios and growth of e-ling for the majortypes of return. A parallel analysis was performed for the
business categories.Applying various time series and exponentialsmoothing forecasting models, the authors
projectedmajor return e-lings for the forecast horizons from 2018 to 2025.
Findings First, individualtax returns led electronically have attained the target goal of 80 per cent since
2012, the extendeddeadline by Congress, so have corporations and partnershipsfor Fiscal Year 2017. Second,
both the e-le volume and e-le rate for the grand total, individuals and businesses exhibit monotonically
increasing trends over thesample period. Third, of the grand e-lings, individual returns constitutethe vast
majorityof 84per cent, while business e-les are less than 12 percent.
Originality/value This study is a holistic and comprehensiveanalysis of the adoption of e-ling in the
USA. From the longitudinal analysisand the variety of forecasting models applied, the results show that the
focus should be on the employment tax e-le as it stands at only 41 percent for 2017 due to few mandates,
while the returns make up 65 per cent of total business returns. The authors projected that the grand total
e-ling will attain the Congressional goal of 80 per cent by 2020 along with proposed strategies and
recommendations.
Keywords Individuals, Information, Forecasting, Businesses
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
In the USA, electronic tax and informational returnling capabilities have been available to
the public since 1986. However, the pilot program was started with only ve tax preparers
from Cincinnati, Raleigh-Durham and Phoenix. It was in 1990 that the electronic tax ling
capabilities were available nationally. Data about electronic tax lings have been available
to the public since 1995. By the new millennium, electronicling (e-ling) was found to have
taken hold in state and federal agencies (Duncan and Buruss,2005). One such success story
was the California ReadyReturn pilot program that was conducted in 2004 and 2005
(Bankman, 2008). Apart from some issues with the timely availability of data, it received
IJAIM
27,2
352
Received28 June 2018
Revised23 July 2018
Accepted6 August 2018
InternationalJournal of
Accounting& Information
Management
Vol.27 No. 2, 2019
pp. 352-371
© Emerald Publishing Limited
1834-7649
DOI 10.1108/IJAIM-06-2018-0072
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/1834-7649.htm
high ratings from participants. Since then, electronic tax ling practices have grown
signicantly during these 14 years, and experts at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have
been monitoring its use and have provided Congress with periodic information on the
adoption of this technologyby the public.
In addition, a variety of other researchers have also examined and reported on its
adoption by individuals,businesses and other complying entities.
Attention to the usage and adoption of e-ling became mission critical after the US
Congress passed the IRS Restructuringand Reform Act (IRS RRA) of 1998. Specically, this
Act mandated that the IRS reach an 80 per cent of e-ling rate for all federal tax and
information returns by 2007. Unfortunately, it is now common knowledge that the 80 per
cent goal was not attained that year (Koong et al.,2008;Lacijan, 2009). The IRS Oversight
Board attributed the inability to meet the original target on a number of factors, including
problems and delays with the IRS Business Systems Modernization program and a public
wariness about transmittingpersonal data over the internet (Russell, 2008).
However, it shouldbe pointed out that the IRS has been proactive in its effortto boost the
utilization of electronic tax ling by the public during that period. For example, after 2005,
the IRS ended Telele and tax ling by phone after Free File was introduced and
implemented in 2003 to enhance efciency. That same year, the 68.4m individual electronic
tax lings helped to push the utilizationrate above the 50 per cent threshold. IRS also began
modernizing its legacye-ling system in 2004 and extended the deadline until 2012.
There have been major developments in individual Form 1040 e-le over the years to
push for the 80 per cent e-le goal. For example, privateindustry leaders began offering free
Federal e-le in retail tax preparation software in 2009 and the rst phase of Form 1040
Modernized e-le (MeF) in 2010. Furthermore, the IRS initiated preparer (with 100 or more
returns) e-le mandate in 2011, with fullimplementation of preparer (11 or more returns) e-
le mandate and Form 1040 MeF in 2012. All of these progressive efforts and instruments
helped to achieve the 80 per cent e-le target in 2012.
Fiscal year 2018 is expected to be another critical phase for assessing the growth of
electronic tax and informational return ling utilization in the USA. The sweeping
Republican Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that was signed into law in December 2017 is
projected to increase the number of non-itemized tax lers. This prediction is based on the
doubling of the standard deduction allowances for the individual and the family and the
elimination or limitations placed on popular deductions such moving expenses, medical
expenses, Archer MedicalSavings Accounts, State, local, sales and propertytax deductions,
adoption assistance programs, dependent care assistance programs, mortgage interest,
educational, alimony and casualty loss deductions and recharacterization of Roth
conversions (Anglin et al., 2017;Drucker and Rappeport, 2017;Goheen et al., 2017). Of
particular importance to increasing the utilization of electronic tax ling after 2017 is the
elimination of tax preparation expenses (accountants and software) as a deduction. As a
result of these major changesto the tax code, it is expected that the public usage of electronic
tax ling will experiencea dramatic increase in the coming year.
The strategic importance of e-le derives in part from its benets to taxpayers. The
benets include no need to mail paper returns, faster refunds, greater return accuracy,
conrmation of e-ling receiptand secure submission of highly personal returninformation.
E-ling also substantiallyreduces IRS submission processing costs. Furthermore, thelower
error rate on e-le returns reduces burden on taxpayers and avoids additional processing
costs for the IRS. In addition, e-le enables100 per cent capture of the information on returns
in a digital fashion, which facilities service improvements (Internal Revenue Service
Oversight Board,2012).
Electronic tax
return
353

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT