Achieving positive outcomes from online training. Goal setting and achievement goal orientation

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-03-2023-0064
Published date05 May 2023
Date05 May 2023
Pages43-46
Subject MatterHR & organizational behaviour,Human resource policy,Employee welfare
Achieving positive outcomes from
online training
Goal setting and achievement goal orientation
Workplace training in the wake of Covid-19
The critical role learning plays in helping firms compete and grow is well-documented.
Effective training is likewise imperative if learning is to occur. However, the global Covid-19
outbreak in early 2020 served to severely disrupt conventional training methods.
Restrictions meant usual in-person training was largely curtailed and replaced by programs
delivered online.
Since then, the business world has witnessed an explosion in remote forms of learning. It
has therefore become a matter of some urgency to identify factors with scope to ensure it
delivers positive outcomes.
Basic learning strategies generate surface-level learning. Examples of this are taking notes
and memorizing content. On the other hand, deep learning involves more sophisticated
processes. Through engagement in this form of learning, individuals are able to absorb
information and adapt it for future use in other situations. The literature uses Bloom’s
taxonomy to illustrate differentlevels of learning.
Achievement goal orientation and how it has evolved
Explorations of deep learning have noted the significance of achievement goal orientations
(AGOs). These AGOs are defined as individual dispositions that have the capacity to
influence the behavior of learners. They are considered particularly relevant when learning
activities have specific objectives. According to certain scholars, contextual factors and
attainment type mean that these characteristics have scope to vary.
Achievements goals were initially divided into “mastery” and “performance” types.
Things have changed substantially since then and goals now belong in one of four
different categories. Those defined as “mastery-avoidance” place emphasis on not
making personal errors. For “performance-avoidance” goals, making sure that
performance isn’t less effective than outcomes attained by significant others is the main
priority. It is worth noting that the impact of these goals types on achievements such as
learning behaviors has often been negative. Perhaps this is down to the nature and focus
typical of such goals.
Goals labeled “mastery-approach” relate to the development and enhancement of personal
capabilities. The essence of “performance-approach” goals is achieving superior results
than others. Compared to the avoidance goals, a markedly different picture emerges here.
Evidence exists to show they possess thecapacity to favorably influence areas that include
examination results andrelationships with peers.
DOI 10.1108/HRMID-03-2023-0064 VOL. 31 NO. 4 2023, pp. 43-46, ©Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 0967-0734 jHUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL DIGEST jPAGE 43

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT