Access to Finance, Financial Development and Firm Ability to Export: Experience from Asia–Pacific Countries
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12140 |
Author | Durairaj Kumarasamy,Prakash Singh |
Date | 01 March 2018 |
Published date | 01 March 2018 |
Access to Finance, Financial Development and
Firm Ability to Export: Experience from Asia–
Pacific Countries
Durairaj Kumarasamy and Prakash Singh
Received 13 January 2016; Accepted 27 December 2017
With particular reference to Asia–Pacific countries, the present study examines
how access to finance and financial development affects firms’ability to enter
export markets. Using firm-level data from the World Bank Enterprises Survey,
we found that access to finance plays a significant role in improving firms’ability
to export. In addition, development of the financial sector fosters export market
entry. Among the financial development indicators, reach of the banking sector
variable is most prominent. The present study suggests that improvements in
access to finance and financial development (increases in the reach of the banking
sector) enable firms operating away from capital or major cities to enter export
markets easily. The present study supports policy intervention to strengthen access
to the financial sector, which would encourage firms to export, and to facilitate
export market entry for remotely located firms.
Keywords: access to finance, exports, financial development, international trade.
JEL classification codes: D22, F14, O16, O53.
doi: 10.1111/asej.12140
I. Introduction
Exports make an indispensable contribution to economic growth. Higher exports
lead to increases in income levels, more efficient allocation of resources,
improved capacity utilization, greater exploitation of scale and technological
Kumarasamy: ASEAN India Centre, Research and Information System for Developing Countries
(RIS), India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003, India. Singh (corresponding author):
Centre for Regional Trade, 715, IIFT Bhawan, B-21 Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi 110 016,
India. Email: prakash.archa@gmail.com. This research was supported by an ARTNeT post-workshop
grant awarded through the project ‘Impact of trade facilitation measures on poverty and inclusive
growth’funded by the Government of China and implemented by ARTNeT, UNESCAP, Bangkok.
The authors are grateful to the ARTNeT Secretariat for helpful comments and guidance on an earlier
draft of this paper and for technical support in disseminating this paper. We thank participants of the
RIS Breakfast Seminar for their input. We thank Professor Vigneswara Swamy for his critical input.
We also thank Professor Prabir De for his constant encouragement. The authors gratefully acknowl-
edge the comments and suggestions received from an anonymous reviewer of the Journal, which
have helped in improving the paper substantially.
© 2018 East Asian Economic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
Asian Economic Journal 2018, Vol.32 No. 1, 15–38 15
improvements in response to greater competition from abroad (Burney, 1996).
Therefore, export promotion strategies have been adopted in several developing
countries to boost economic growth, including policy support to encourage non-
exporters to enter foreign markets and also to facilitate the export expansion of
existing exporters. As a result, there has been a significant increase in global
trade in general and trade within Asia–Pacific countries in particular. This is fur-
ther reflected in the trade performance of Asia–Pacific countries, which has
shown significant improvement over the past two decades. The contribution of
trade in the global value chain and regional production network has reached
75 to 80 percent of the total trade despite the global financial crisis (ESCAP,
2015). Asia–Pacific has become the largest trading region, with a 37-percent
share of world trade and almost half of Asia–Pacific trade occurring within the
region (UN-ESCAP, 2014).
In the global competitive market, exporting firms face huge challenges to
match the competitive prices and keep up with technological changes. This has
lead firms to invest heavily in R&D, marketing research, product development,
advertising and fixed capital (Hur et al. 2006). Thus, exporting firms are more
dependent on external finance to meet their liquidity needs.
1
Hence, firms with
financial constraints would face difficulty entering into and remaining in the
export market. Given the competitiveness of the global market, existing firms
essentially require additional capital to move up in the value chain. Limited
access to capital holds firms at low value-added stages of the supply chain and
restricts them from exploiting profitable opportunities. In addition, firms newly
entering into the export market require additional investment as a large part of
this investment is sunk and upfront in nature.
Access to financial instruments enables firms to boost their export competi-
tiveness by allowing them to overcome the liquidity problems associated with
export activities. Several studies discuss how financial development reduces
firms’borrowing costs, thereby encouraging firms to enter into the export mar-
ket (e.g. Beck, 2002, 2003; Svaleryd and Vlachos, 2005; Manova, 2013). Other
studies highlight that financial constraint is potentially an important cost of
international trade in a financially underdeveloped country (Manova, 2013).
Therefore, well-developed financial markets and strong banking institutions are
crucial for firms’exporting activities.
Despite the empirical research emphasizing the role of access to finance in
firm performance, access to finance is still a major problem at the firm level in
several developing countries (Beck, 2002), especially in developing countries of
Asia where the financial system remains far below the standards of developed
countries. Furthermore, effect of the 2008 financial crisis transmitted to develop-
ing countries in Asia has affected their credit disbursement. The decline in trade
finance has been more pronounced in countries with less developed financial
1 Up to 90 percent of world trade has been estimated to rely on some form of trade finance
(Auboin, 2009).
ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL 16
To continue reading
Request your trial