Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2019-2147 of Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, November 30, 2019 (case Pet Plan Ltd v. Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org / shi lei / cunshuo zhang)
|Defense:||Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org / shi lei / cunshuo zhang|
|Resolution Date:||November 30, 2019|
|Issuing Organization:||Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI|
[gopetplanreward.com] [petplanreward.com] [wwwpetplanrewards.com]
The Complainant is Pet Plan Ltd, United Kingdom (“Complainant”), represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
The Respondent is Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org, United States of America (“United States”) / shi lei, China / cunshuo zhang, China (“Respondent”).
The disputed domain names [gopetplanreward.com], [petplanreward.com], [wwwpetplanrewards.com] are registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on September 3, 2019. On September 3, 2019, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain names. On September 3, 2019, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain names which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to Complainant on September 9, 2019 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar and inviting Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. Complainant filed an amended Complaint on September 12, 2019. The Center sent the Consolidation email to the Parties on September 19, 2019.
The Center verified that the amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on September 19, 2019. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was October 9, 2019. Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified Respondent’s default on October 10, 2019.
The Center appointed M. Scott Donahey as the sole panelist in this matter on October 16, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the...
To continue readingREQUEST YOUR TRIAL