I/A Court HR. Rights to freedom to organize, collective bargaining, and strike, and their relation to other rights, with a gender perspective (interpretation and scope of articles 13, 15, 16, 24, 25, and 26 in relation to articles 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights; articles 3, 6, 7, and 8 of the Protocol of San Salvador; articles 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Convention of Belém do Pará; articles 34, 44, and 45 of the Charter of the Organization of American States; and articles II, IV, XIV, XXI, and XXII of the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man). Advisory Opinion OC-27/21 of May 5, 2021. Series A No. 27.

Judgment Date05 May 2021
Case TypeOpinión consultiva
CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • AFFAIRE ANGERJÄRV ET GREINOMAN c. ESTONIE
    • International Law
    • Third Section (European Court of Human Rights)
    • October 4, 2022
    ...based on an autonomous assessment which does not depend on classification under domestic law (see König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 88, Series A no. 27). Therefore, a sanction may fall within the scope of Article 6 § 1 even if it was adopted outside disciplinary proceedings under domestic l......
  • AFFAIRE GHERARDI MARTIRI c. SAINT-MARIN
    • International Law
    • First Section (European Court of Human Rights)
    • December 15, 2022
    ...covers the whole of the proceedings in question, including appeal proceedings (see König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98 in fine, Series A no. 27) and extends right up to the decision which disposes of the dispute (see Poiss v. Austria, 23 April 1987, § 50, Series A no. 117).125. According t......
  • AFFAIRE FOUTAS ARISTIDOU c. CHYPRE
    • International Law
    • Third Section Committee (European Court of Human Rights)
    • June 7, 2022
    ...began on 26 January 2010 and ended on 3 October 2014 when the Supreme Court gave its judgment (see König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no. 27). It lasted approximately four years and eight months at two levels of jurisdiction.7. The proceedings were not, as such, complex and, ove......
  • KEDIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
    • International Law
    • Second Section Committee (European Court of Human Rights)
    • September 27, 2022
    ...This period covers the whole of the proceedings in question, including appeal proceedings (see König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no. 27).8. The reasonableness of the length of proceedings is to be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, regard being h......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT