I/A Court H.R., Indefinite Presidential Re-election in Presidential Systems in the context of the Inter-American System of Human Rights (Interpretation and scope of Articles 1, 23, 24 and 32 of the American Convention on Human Rights, XX of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, 3(d) of the Charter of the Organization of American States and of the Inter-American Democratic Charter). Advisory Opinion OC-28/21 of June 7, 2021. Series A No 28.
| Judgment Date | 07 June 2021 |
| Case Type | Opinión consultiva |
| Court | Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 cases
-
Report No. 121 (2025) IACHR. Petition No. 137-18, 432-18, 2417-18 (Bolivia)
...Constitucional 1010/2023 el 28 de diciembre de 2023 dispuso: Conforme fue explicado, considerando el desarrollo efectuado en la Opinión Consultiva OC-28/21 de 7 de junio de 2021 el art. 23 de la CADH no constituye un impedimento para el Constituyente o el Legislador para establecer limitaci......
-
BORZYKH v. UKRAINE
...directly affected by it, that it may contravene the Convention (see, for example, Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 33, Series A no. 28). 39. However, it is open to a person to contend that a law violates his or her rights, in the absence of an individual measure of implement......
-
A.M. AND OTHERS v. POLAND
...applied to him, on account of the secret nature of the measures it authorised (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 33, Series A no. 28); where a law against homosexual acts was capable of being applied to a certain category of the people, which included the applicant (see N......
-
AFFAIRE KACZMAREK c. POLOGNE
...notions of “private life” and “correspondence” referred to by that provision (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 41, Series A no. 28, and Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 44, ECHR 2000-II).71. The right to protection of reputation is a right which is covered by t......
Get Started for Free