The Role of the Real Estate Sector in the Structural Dynamics of the Chinese Economy: An Input–Output Analysis

AuthorEric Girardin,Umair Shad,Yongming Huang,Jamal Khan
Published date01 January 2021
Date01 January 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12363
©2021 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
China & World Economy / 61–86, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2021 61
*Yongming Huang, Professor, Institute for Region and UrbanRural Development, and Center for Industrial
Development and Regional Competitiveness, Wuhan University, China . Email: hym@whu.edu.cn; Jamal
Khan (corresponding author), PhD Candidate, Institute for Region and UrbanRural Development, Wuhan
University, China. Email: jamalkhan_87@yahoo.com; Eric Girardin, Professor, Aix-Marseille University,
Centre National de la Recherche Scientif‌i que, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Aix-Marseille
School of Economics, France. Email: eric.girardin@univ-amu.fr; Umair Shad, Assistant Registrar, Hazara
University, Pakistan. Email: umair.shad@yahoo.com. This work is supported by Social Science Foundation
Project of China Ministry of Education (No. 17YJC790184) .
The Role of the Real Estate Sector in the
Structural Dynamics of the Chinese Economy:
An Input−Output Analysis
Yongming Huang, Jamal Khan, Eric Girardin, Umair Shad*
Abstract
Market-oriented housing reforms and the rapid urbanization process have led to spectacular
growth in the Chinese real estate sector (RES). However, the changes in the role played
by this sector in the structural dynamics of the Chinese economy have not been examined
sufficiently. Accordingly, we analyze the intersectoral structural changes to the Chinese
RES, its linkages with the rest of the economy, and its growth sources, using four Chinese
input−output tables from 2002 to 2017. We depart from existing work on the RES by using
the causative matrix approach and structural decomposition analysis, and obtain three main
results. First, the RES, which received little non-RES feedback during the 2002−2007 period,
has subsequently received much more substantial feedback. Second, the impact of the RES
on China’s economic growth stems mainly from its forward linkages. Third, the growth in
the RES has been driven mainly by domestic demand expansion. Our results highlight that
the Chinese RES, which plays a key role in value chains, is highly dependent on its own
f‌i nal demand and a fall in its demand would impede economic development. An important
implication of these results is that developing the national economy by stimulating the RES
would not be as effective as developing the RES through stimulating the national economy.
Key words: causative matrix, linkage, real estate sector, structural decomposition
JEL codes: E51, R02, R15
I. Introduction
China’s real estate sector (RES) has been profoundly transformed over the last two
decades, and is widely considered to be one of the major drivers of the country’s
Yongming Huang et al. / 61–86, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2021
©2021 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
62
economic growth. Such transformations stem from various sources. Starting in the late
1990s, the introduction of market-oriented housing reforms has contributed decisively
to the transformation of that sector. Large-scale ruralurban migration, accelerated
urbanization, and rapid industrial growth of the new millennium, followed by sharp rise
of the new economy over the last decade, have also created an enormous demand for
housing, and industrial and commercial buildings, inducing a rapid development of the
RES services (Mak et al., 2012). As a consequence, investment in the RES increased
from 4 percent of GDP in 1997 to 13 percent 20 years later.1 However, the RES is much
more important to the Chinese economy than these RES investment figures would
imply2 (Wang and Liu, 2004; Eftimoski and McLoughli, 2019). On the one hand,
the RES is linked with upstream sectors such as steel, cement, chemicals, plastics,
electrical, and other manufacturing sectors (Wu et al., 2020). On the other hand, the
RES is associated with downstream sectors such as household appliances, furniture, and
upholstery (Li et al., 2008).
Housing reforms, along with rapid urbanization and real estate investment, are
likely to have led to very substantial changes in the intersectoral linkages of the RES
with downstream and upstream sectors, in turn impacting the push and pull capabilities
of the RES in the Chinese economy. The sizeable direct and indirect effects of the RES
therefore show the importance of analyzing the structural changes in the intersectoral
linkages of the RES with the rest of the economy, and of measuring the growth sources
of the output of the RES. This would help policymakers to understand the evolving
role of the RES in the Chinese economy, enabling them to design policies better able
to stimulate and regulate aggregate economic growth, while taking into account the
linkages of RES with other sectors as well as its push and pull effects.
We pursue three objectives in this study. First, we aim to measure the changes to the
intersectoral feedback relationships of the RES with non-RES sectors over the last two
decades. Our second objective is to gauge the real estate intensities3 of different sectors
and variations over time, to explore the changes in the push and pull effects of the RES
along with the movements in its backward and forward linkages. Our third objective is
to assess the contribution of the RES output to the national economy, to analyze the past
1Real estate sector investment has signif‌i cantly contributed to GDP growth with an average contribution of
2 percent from 2003 to 2017. The value-added share of the RES also rose from 1.9 percent (ranked 17th)
in 1997 to 7.1 percent (ranked second) two decades later. The sector employed 4.66 million people in 2018
but its share in total employment increased more than 20 times to reach 2.7 percent in 2018 (Eftimoski and
McLoughli, 2019).
2The RES has been strongly linked to China’s f‌i nancial system through various channels (Bai et al., 2016) and
is closely associated with consulting and other service sectors (Li et al., 2008).
3Real estate intensity means the extent to which a non-RES takes input from the RES.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT