The Effect of Crosslisting on Corporate Governance: A Review of the International Evidence

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00743.x
Date01 May 2009
AuthorStephen P. Ferris,Kenneth A. Kim,Gregory Noronha
Published date01 May 2009
The Effect of Crosslisting on Corporate
Governance: A Review of the International
Evidence
Stephen P. Ferris*, Kenneth A. Kim and Gregory Noronha
ABSTRACT
Manuscript Type: Review
Research Question: This review essay examines the mechanisms by which crosslisting of a f‌irm’s shares on a foreign stock
exchange and its subsequent exposure to an international capital market can induce changes in corporate governance. We
also review reasons why a f‌irm might elect to use crosslisting to improve investor perceptionof the quality of its governance.
Research Findings/Results: After a review of the existing literature, we conclude that there is substantial support for legal
bonding in the decision to crosslist, with lesser evidence consistent with reputational bonding. We also conclude that f‌irm
growth opportunities and the need for external capital are critical factors in a decision to crosslist.
Theoretical Implications: This study synthesizes the extensive empirical work done on crosslisting and consequent
changes in corporate governance structures. It also highlights a number of areas that require further research including
more direct testing of governance changes following crosslisting, the effect of crosslisting on corporate equity ownership
structures, and the investment/new securities issuance behavior of f‌irms subsequent to crosslisting. This research will help
to chart the path of future academic study by scholars of international corporate governance.
Practical Implications: This review of the empirical evidence will contribute to the identif‌ication of a set of best practices
that can lead to improved governance for f‌irms worldwide. Furthermore, the discussion of what remains unexamined by
governance researchers will help to shape the contours of future policy and legislative debate.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Crossinglistening, Bonding
INTRODUCTION
This literature review examines how a f‌irm can voluntar-
ily modify the corporate governance standards that are
imposed upon it by the forces of its national law, through
what Goergen and Renneboog (2008) refer to as “contractual
corporate governance.” More specif‌ically, by crosslisting its
stock on the exchange of another nation, a f‌irm can effec-
tively choose the level of protection and regulation it pro-
vides to its investors. This essay will review, in-depth, the
existing literature on the corporate governance effects result-
ing from the crosslisting of a f‌irm’s equity and the mecha-
nisms by which those changes occur. For purposes of clarity,
we def‌ine crosslisting as the process by which a f‌irm incor-
porated in one country elects to list its equity on the public
stock exchange of another country.
As noted by Karolyi (2006), among others, there are a
number of factors that might motivate a f‌irm to crosslist its
shares. Among these considerations are the desire to obtain
investment capital at a lower rate, achieve a higher share
valuation, enjoy increased liquidity and market depth for its
shares, and obtain a greatermarket share for its products and
services. Tothis list, we add the desire for improvedcorporate
governance. This review, however, will focus exclusively on
the corporate governance effects of a crosslisting.
There are several reasons why a survey of the crosslisting
literature is both useful and timely. First, unlike previous
studies of crosslistings such as Foerster and Karolyi (1999)
and Karolyi (1998; 2006), this work limits its focus to
governance-related issues associated with a f‌irm’s decision
to crosslist. Consequently, it provides important guidance
regarding the design of corporate governancestructures that
will be useful to f‌irms in emerging markets and to national
policy makers seeking to stimulate their economies by
attracting foreign investment capital. Second, this review
*Address for correspondence: Stephen P. Ferris, University of Missouri, Trulaske
College of Business, 404 Cornell Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. E-mail: ferriss@
missouri.edu
338
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2009, 17(3): 338–352
© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00743.x

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex