The drastic change of the EU relationship with ACP countries in the context of international economic relations
Date | 11 March 2014 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-05-2013-0015 |
Published date | 11 March 2014 |
Pages | 67-79 |
Author | Ana Manero Salvador |
Subject Matter | Strategy,International business,International business law |
The drastic change of the EU
relationship with ACP countries
in the context of international
economic relations
Ana Manero Salvador
University Carlos III, Getafe, Spain
Abstract
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to analyze the adjustment of relations between the EU and ACP
countries to multilateral requirements.
Design/methodology/approach – Has been carried out an analysis of the previous situation,
the reasons and the result of the adjustment. To do this, they have been pursued literary and
documentary sources.
Findings – The European Union’s relations with the ACP countries have changed drastically.
Now there is no unity of action of ACP, and the relations with the EU relations are atomized.
Originality/value – The submitted article summarizes and critically analyzes the evolution of the
European Union’s relations with ACP countries. The relationship with the ACP has been historically
and currently lost its specificity, so it is diluted in the context of the external action of the
European Union.
Keywords WTO, EU, ACP
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
The actions regarding development cooperation are probably those that have
provided the European Union the greatest international visibility. Now then, these
expressions are deeply heterogeneous and respond to a historical process by virtue of
which, to the degree that new members participated in the process of integration,
the development cooperation expanded itself geographically until being, as of today,
totally global.
Despite this expansion, relations with ACP countries have always been special.
This has led to the doctrine for distinguishing between “development cooperation
relations and development cooperation policy” while the legal basis of both
actions was different. Accordingly, although it was the 1992 Treaty of the
European Union where these actions were set forth in a treaty – Title XVII of the EC
Treaty – these provisions did not provideacomprehensivecoveragebecauseit
excluded “such qualification that, without a doubt, is its most emblematic action in
this area and that best represents the traditional regional conception of these
relations [...]TheLome
´Policy” (Sobrino Heredia, 1997, p. 108) that is the relations
with the ACP States.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/1477-0024.htm
This paper is framed within the research project “Gobernanza y reforma de las Instituciones
econo
´micas internacionales en la crisis econo
´mica” (DER 2010-20414-CO2-01).
Received 28 May 2013
Revised 3 December 2013
Accepted 20 January 2014
Journal of International Trade Law
and Policy
Vol. 13 No. 1, 2014
pp. 67-79
qEmerald Group Publishing Limited
1477-0024
DOI 10.1108/JITLP-05-2013-0015
Drastic change
of the EU
relationship
67
To continue reading
Request your trial