The Determinants of China's Minimum Wage Rates

Published date01 May 2023
AuthorAchim Schmillen,Michael Stops,Dewen Wang
Date01 May 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12489
©2023 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
China & World Economy / 59–91, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2023 59
The Determinants of China’s Minimum Wage Rates
Achim Schmillen, Michael Stops, Dewen Wang*
Abstract
We use a highly disaggregated panel of macro data and minimum wages at the county
level to investigate the processes behind minimum wage adjustments in China. Relying
on random eff ects models, spatial econometrics techniques, and multilevel analyses, we
document that a comparatively small number of economic variables – including the local
price level and GDP per capita – are important determinants of minimum wage rates.
Interactions between adjacent counties and counties of the same administrative type, and
centralized mechanisms, particularly at the provincial level, also play an important role
in explaining the variance in minimum wage rates across counties. Finally, we show that
China’s provinces are the key players for setting minimum wage rates and that, when
they do so, they are not uniform in the way they weigh diff erent economic variables.
Keywords: applied spatial econometrics, China, highly disaggregated macro data,
minimum wage setting, multilevel analysis, strategic interactions between subnational
governments
JEL codes: C23, J30, R23
I. Introduction
Since the seminal contribution by Card and Krueger (1994), a large body of literature
has studied the effects of minimum wage rates on wages, employment, and other
outcome variables.1 In contrast, the setting and determinants of minimum wages have
*Achim Schmillen, Practice Leader for Human Development, World Bank, Indonesia. Email: aschmillen@
worldbank.org; Michael Stops, Senior Researcher, Institute for Employment Research, Germany. Email:
michael.stops@iab.de; Dewen Wang (corresponding author), Senior Social Protection Economist, World Bank,
China. Email: dwang2@worldbank.org. The authors thank Mario Bossler, Tobias Haepp, Michael Murach,
Josefi na Posadas, Juliane Scheff el, Hans-Jörg Schmerer, and Helmut Wagner as well as participants at several
seminars and workshops for helpful comments and suggestions, and Xichen Li, Carl Lin, Chunyang Pan, and
Jin Song for graciously sharing relevant literature and data. Linghui (Jude) Zhu provided outstanding research
assistance and the Nordic Trust Fund provided funding support. Findings, interpretations, and conclusions
expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Nordic Trust
Fund, the World Bank, its affi liated organizations, its executive directors, or the governments these represent.
1For China, studies that explore the eff ects of minimum wages on wages, employment, and other outcome
variables include those by Huang et al. (2014), Lin and Yun (2016), and Démurger et al. (2021).
Achim Schmillen et al. / 59–91, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2023
©2023 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
60
received relatively little attention in the literature. Whitaker et al. (2012, p. 631) note
that “the fact that [minimum] wage increases are understudied is particularly puzzling
given the fi erce ideological confl ict the policy engenders.” To contribute to closing this
knowledge gap, we use panel data on county-level minimum wage rates and highly
disaggregated macro variables from 2005 to 2014 to investigate the processes behind
minimum wage adjustments in China.
China has no uniform nationwide minimum wage. Instead, the country’s Five-Year
Plans set general targets regarding the development of minimum wage levels, and the
Minimum Wage Regulations of 2004 (2004 Regulations) list a range of factors capturing
local economic or social conditions that provincial governments should consider when
setting their own minimum standards. The 2004 Regulations also give provincial
governments some discretion to set different minimum wages in different locations
within a province. This, in principle, could result in diff erent minimum wages for each
of China’s 2,843 county-level administrative divisions.
We exploit this cross-sectional variation to explore economic and noneconomic
infl uences underlying minimum wage setting in China with the help of random eff ects
models (REM). The REMs allow us to control for county-specifi c explanatory variables,
province-specific fixed effects, and time fixed effects. They correlate minimum wage
rates with proxies for the factors that are to be considered by provincial governments in
setting these rates according to the 2004 Regulations. We extract these variables from a
range of Chinese administrative data sources. In addition, we rely on spatial econometric
techniques to study the role of both central mechanisms and spatial dependence between
subnational governments. Spatial dependence might be an indication of strategic
interaction between subnational governments and is thus expected to play a prominent
role in determining minimum wages in a context like China’s, where provinces compete
with each other for investors or mobile workers. There are a plethora of newspaper
reports and other anecdotal evidence about China’s minimum wages being, first,
infl uenced by such considerations and, second, seen as a strong signal for the level of
local labor costs (Financial Times, 2010; Reuters, 2011; CBS News, 2014). Finally,
we employ multilevel analyses to assess the relative importance of two hierarchical
levels of subnational governments (the provincial and county levels) in explaining the
variance of minimum wage rates and to explore in more detail how China’s provincial
governments apply the legal rules on setting minimum wages rates spelled out in the
2004 Regulations.
We find, first, that the local price level and the GDP per capita are the most
important economic determinants of minimum wage rates. Localities with higher
prices and higher GDP per capita tend to exhibit higher minimum wage rates. Other
©2023 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
The Determinants of China’s Minimum Wage Rates 61
explanatory variables, like the average annual salary or the employment-to-population
ratio, have no signifi cant eff ects on minimum wage rates.
Second, in addition to the factors that are to be considered by provincial governments
in setting minimum wage rates, strategic interaction eff ects also have explanatory power.
We test two approaches: First, following Dreger et al. (2019) and Li et al. (2019), we
compare strategic interactions through the setting of minimum wages for neighboring
localities; in contrast with earlier studies, we do not compare minimum wages between
neighboring prefectures but between neighboring counties. Second, we examine
strategic interactions through the setting of minimum wages for counties of the same
administrative county types as a proxy for similar socio-economic conditions. Both
approaches indicate that strategic interaction explains an important share of the variance
of minimum wage rates across counties.2 This finding is consistent with competition
between provinces influencing their minimum wage-setting behavior, possibly in
addition to central adjustment mechanisms.3
Finally, as envisaged by the 2004 Regulations, the provincial level is of prime
importance in explaining the variance of minimum wage rates in China. Our analysis
also indicates that provinces diff er in how they weigh diff erent economic variables when
setting minimum wage rates.
This study contributes to the literature on the setting and determination of minimum
wages. Relevant theoretical contributions include Hungerbühler and Lehmann (2009)
and Lee and Saez (2012). Hungerbühler and Lehmann (2009) argue that a minimum
wage can be optimal if workers’ bargaining power is relatively low in a framework
where search frictions generate unemployment. Lee and Saez (2012) show that even
in a perfectly competitive labor market, a binding minimum wage – while leading to
unemployment – can nevertheless be desirable if one values redistribution toward low-
wage workers.
In reality, most governments change minimum wages not based on rigorous
economic theory but by following rules of thumb, engaging in (formal or informal)
bargaining with employers and labor unions, and considering the country’s context and
certain economic or noneconomic criteria. The number of empirical studies evaluating
the exact processes underlying minimum wage changes is very limited. This is because
2This fi nding is validated by a sensitivity analysis based on arbitrarily chosen spatial dependence structures,
which results in estimates of the strategic interaction coeffi cients that are not statistically signifi cant.
3All our specifications include year dummies. Coefficient estimates for these are all positive and
signifi cant and reveal a positive time trend, even when we control for local economic conditions. This
points toward central adjustment mechanisms being at least partly responsible for positive and gradual
rate adjustments.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex