The Administrator - Representative or Employee of the Limited Liability Company. Aspects of Comparative Law

AuthorOlga-Andreea Urda
ProfessionAlexandru Ioan Cuza' University of Iasi, Romania
Pages35-43
The Administrator - Representative or Employee of the Limited Lia-
bility Company. Aspects of Comparative Law
Lecturer Olga-Andreea URDA
1
Abstract
It has been frequently analyzed, in the doctrine and practice of commercial law,
whether it is op portune to conclude an individual emplo yment contract between the ad-
ministrator and the limited liability company or a mandate contract. In the context of the
free movement of persons in the Member States of the European Union, we consider that
it is necessary to have a comparative analysis of company law, especially in the particular
matter of the administrator-society relationship. The present study proposes an analysis
of compared law between the provisions of Romanian law and those of French la w re-
garding the management of contracts that may intervene between the administrator and
the company. Thus, the difficulties related to determining the possibility or not of the
administrator to conclude an individual employment contract with the limited liabili ty
company can find their solution through a mirror analysis of another legislative model.
Keywords: administrator, mandate contract, individual employment contract,
limited liability company
JEL Classification: K20, K22
1. Introduction
In the doctrine and practice of corporate law, the question has frequently
been asked to what extent an administrator can conclude an individual employ-
ment contract with the company he administers.
In the case of the joint stock company, the answer is offered unequivo-
cally even by Law no. 31/1990, meaning in which art. 1371 para. (3) expressly
provides that "during the fulfillment of the mandate, the directors cannot conclude
with the company an employment contract. If the directors have been appointed
from the employees of the company, the individual employment contract is sus-
pended during the term of the mandate". But another is the situation of the limited
liability company, in which the silence of the law led to a series of polemics.
Obviously the problems that exist in the practice of commercial law, gen-
erated by the lack of an express provision of the law, demand, de lege ferenda,
an intervention of the legislator that expresses its position clearly in the face of
this controversy.
We will thus observe in the analysis of comparative law below, that the
1
Olga-Andreea Urda - „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, Romania, olga.alexandru@
uaic.ro.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT