Supply chain integration strategies in fast evolving industries

Published date13 February 2017
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2015-0013
Pages29-46
Date13 February 2017
AuthorEhsan Sabet,Nahid Yazdani,Sander De Leeuw
Subject MatterManagement science & operations,Logistics
Supply chain integration strategies
in fast evolving industries
Ehsan Sabet
Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering,
Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Nahid Yazdani
Department of Business and Economics, Loughborough University,
Loughborough, UK, and
Sander De Leeuw
Business School, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK and
Faculty of Economics and Business, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to define the fast evolving industry(FEI) and its supply chain
management (SCM) challenges. The authors review and structure the literature regarding integration
strategies and implementation methods to develop a strategic decision-making framework for SCM in the FEI.
Design/methodology/approach The authors conduct a review of SCM literature, including supply chain
strategy, supply chain integration (SCI), agile and responsive supply chain and SCM for innovative and fast-
changing industries. The authors develop a conceptual model and a decision-making framework and use four
mini cases to provide support for the model and framework.
Findings The FEI, characterised by a high level of innovation and differentiation, short products/services
lifecycle and high variety, is yet tobe fully defined. Inherent uncertainty in FEI supply systems makes SCM in these
industries a complex but strategic task for their managers. The framework and the model offered in this study,
which employ a core competency concept and provide risk management strategies, offer a strategic tool for
managers and scholars in the fieldt o optimisetheir integration strategies and to operationalise integration decisions.
Originality/value Little research has been published on transferable and cross-industrial SCM in FEIs.
This paper defines the FEI and its resource-related concerns and then offers a conceptual model and a
strategic decision-making framework for SCI in FEIs.
Keywords Supply chain management, Supply chainstrategy, Supply chain integration,Agile supply chain,
Fast evolving industries, Responsive supply chain
Paper type Conceptual paper
1. Introduction
Fast evolving industries (FEIs) are industries characterised by high levels of innovation
and differentiation (Humphrey and Schmitz, 2002), high-product/service variety and
low-product/service life or replenishment cycles (Bilgen and Günther, 2010) and increasingly
sophisticated customers (Stevenson and Spring, 2007). Applying this definition, one can
observe that FEIs account for a large proportion of high added-value industries in
developed countries, for example, electronics and telecommunications (Arnold, 1999),
semiconductors (Brown et al., 2000), fast moving consumer goods (Siemieniuch et al., 1999),
pharmaceutical goods (Narayana et al., 2014), video games (Broekhuizen et al., 2013),
advertising (Bakhshi and McVittie, 2009) and music (Caves, 2000). Moreover, since market
The International Journal of
Logistics Management
Vol. 28 No. 1, 2017
pp. 29-46
Emerald Publishing Limited
0957-4093
DOI 10.1108/IJLM-01-2015-0013
Received 20 January 2015
Revised 20 October 2015
12 April 2016
Accepted 8 June 2016
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/0957-4093.htm
© Sabet, Yazdani, De Leeuw. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under
the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate
and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject
to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at
http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/3.0/legalcode
29
SCI strategies
volatility is increasingly evident in global economies and life cycles in many industries are
shortening (Christopher, 2000), FEI boundaries are expanding, which makes them an
important category of industry to study.
However, there have been few studies defining the FEI or formulating transferable
management knowledge and practices across different sectors of FEIs. Of those cross-industrial
studies that do exist, a majority are market-focussed and relatively few are resource oriented.
Cross-industrial market-focussed studies of FEIs include comparisons on customer satisfaction
(Gilbert and Veloutsou, 2006), customer relationship (Wulf et al., 2001) and customer loyalty
(Martensen et al., 2000). Examples of cross-industrial resource-focussed studies of FEIs are papers
on competition mechanisms (Lieberman and Asaba, 2006), technological capabilities (Park et al.,
2008), leadership style (Lok and Crawford, 2004) and strategic partnerships (Dodourova, 2009).
Since demand configurations are highly uncertain and fragmented in FEIs (Christopher
et al., 2004), resource design and allocations in these industries are highly strategic and complex
(Nachiappan and Jawahar,2014). The higherthe pace of change in an industry the largeris the
impact of supply chain management (SCM) on the competitive advantage of the firms (Perrons
and Platts, 2005). SCM must therefore be at the centre of strategic business reengineering
efforts in FEIs (Arnold, 1999). Although there are numerous studies of SCM in FEIs within
sectors they rarely go beyond sector boundaries to obtain cross-sectional SCM understanding.
The rapidly changing markets of FEIs point to an ever-increasing need for flexible and
responsive supply chains (Gunasekaran et al., 2008; Christopher et al., 2004). Integration
with suppliers is essential to meeting this need (Richey et al., 2009). Although supply chain
integration (SCI) has received significant research focus in recent years (Wu and Barnes,
2011), with regard to FEIs it is an under-examined area of research.
This paper aims to develop a decision-making framework for SCI strategies and
implementation mechanisms in FEIs. The next section explains how FEIs need agile
and responsive supply systems and describes existing models and frameworks that could
be used in FEIs. Section 3 further explains the importance of SCI as the main means of
achieving agility and responsiveness for FEI supply chains. In an attempt to develop an
SCM conceptual model and decision-making framework for FEI, Section 4 reviews the
underlying drivers of SCI as well as the best implementation practices and mechanisms
given the varying levels of supply uncertainty and varying levels of products/services
importance to the core business of FEIs. The conceptual model and decision-making
framework will be further elaborated by four mini cases, after which we conclude.
2. FEIs and agile supply
One of the earliest and major attempts to propose a supply selection model was by Kraljic
(1983), who articulated that firms must adapt their purchase strategies to supply uncertainty.
Kraljic (1983) suggested that SC strategies should be established on the strategic importance of
purchasingand the complexity of the supply network(p. 110) in order to establish close
collaboration with the suppliers. Later, Fishers (1997) model asserted that demand structure
differs by industry and that products/services are either functional or innovative. This model
also categorised supply chains as efficientor responsiveand identified which type fits best
within different market structures. Fishers model, therefore, is one of the earliest frameworks
that can be employed for strategic supply chain selection in FEIs, as in these industries product
life cycles tend to be short, demand is variable and product variety is often high. Employing this
model for FEIs, the market-responsive SC strategymust be adopted in order to minimize
stock-outs, forced markdowns, and obsolete inventory(Fisher, 1997, p. 108). However, this
model does not provide the necessary level of detail on how responsive FEI suppliers must be,
or how to operationalise this responsiveness.
Fisher (1997, p. 114) further advises that upon identifying an innovative product a
company can manage uncertainty by finding sources of new data that can serve as leading
30
IJLM
28,1

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT