Sport in prison: social and subjective health outcomes of different sport programs
| Date | 04 August 2023 |
| Pages | 682-698 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-10-2022-0062 |
| Published date | 04 August 2023 |
| Subject Matter | Health & social care,Criminology & forensic psychology,Prisoner health,Sociology,Sociology of crime & law,Public policy & environmental management,Policing,Criminal justice |
| Author | Elisa Herold,Pamela Wicker,Uta Czyrnick-Leber,Bernd Gröben,Milan Dransmann |
Sport in prison: social and subjective
health outcomes of different
sport programs
Elisa Herold, Pamela Wicker, Uta Czyrnick-Leber, Bernd Gröben and Milan Dransmann
Abstract
Purpose –The purpose of this studyis to examine the effects of four different sport programs on various
social andsubjective health outcomes amongprisoners.
Design/methodology/approach –Four different sport programs (endurance, strength, dance-like
martial arts, soccer) were provided in 2020 and 2021 in a German prison. Participants completed
paper-pencil surveys before and afterthe sport programs (n¼134 observations), including questions
about potential socialhealth (enjoyment of physical activity, interpersonalexchange, interpersonal trust,
self-efficacy) and subjective health outcomes (health status, health satisfaction, well-being). Further
informationsuch as prisoner characteristicswere added to the data.
Findings –Results of regression analysesshow that the endurance program had a significant positive
effect on interpersonal trust, while the soccer program had a negative effect. Subjective well-being
increased significantly after the strength and the soccer program. The weekly sport hours before
imprisonment had a positiveassociation with enjoyment of physical activityand interpersonal exchange
while beingnegatively related to health statusand health satisfaction. Furthermore,the number of months
of imprisonmentbefore the survey, being a young offender, the prisoners’body mass index, educational
level and migration background were significantly associated with several socialand subjective health
outcomes.
Originality/value –This study analyzed theeffects of different sport programs for prisonerson various
social and subjective health outcomes, revealing differences across programs and outcomes. The
findings suggest that sportcan be a way to enhance prisoners’ social and subjective health,ultimately
facilitatingtheir rehabilitation process.
Keywords Self-efficacy, Social capital, Sport, Subjective well-being, Young male inmates,
Adult male inmates
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Sport has the potential to generate various social and subjective health outcomes within
society and is, therefore also an important activity during the rehabilitation process of
prisoners (Andrews and Andrews, 2003). Furthermore, sport represents the most popular
leisure activity of prisoners (Kuhn, 2019) as participating in sport allows them to
overcome the monotony and boredom of daily imprisonment routines (Lleix
aandRı
´os,
2015;Mu
¨ller and Mutz, 2019). In many western countries, prison populations are still at a
high level (P
erez-Moreno et al., 2007): Based on the 13th edition of the world prison
population list, the median prison population rate for western European countries is 73
per 100,000. Consequently, the social interest in factors that facilitate prisoner’s
rehabilitation is high (Moscoso-S
anchez et al., 2017). Sport participation can be one
factor in this respect by producing various health outcomes (Moscoso-S
anchez et al.,
2017;Woods et al., 2017).
Elisa Herold is based at the
Department of Sports
Science, Bielefeld
University, Bielefeld,
Germany and Institute of
Sport Economics and Sport
Management, German
Sport University Cologne,
Cologne, Germany.
Pamela Wicker,
Uta Czyrnick-Leber,
Bernd Gro
¨ben and
Milan Dransmann are all
based at the Department of
Sports Science, Bielefeld
University, Bielefeld,
Germany.
Received 14 October 2022
Revised 17 January 2023
6 March 2023
25 April 2023
Accepted 9 July 2023
PAGE 682 jINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRISONER HEALTH jVOL. 19 NO. 4 2023, pp. 682-698, ©EmeraldPublishing Limited, ISSN 1744-9200 DOI 10.1108/IJPH-10-2022-0062
Following the World Health Organization[World Health Organisation (WHO), 2022], health is
defined as not only the absence of disease or infirmity, but also complete physical, mental
and social well-being. Consequently, health encompasses not only an objective health
status (e.g. having a healthy body weight, blood pressure,blood values) but also subjective
health perception and social health.Social health relates to the interaction of individuals and
how individuals are getting alongwith each other (McDowell and Newell, 1987;Vandenbos,
2009). Following the Pan American Health Organization [Pan American HealthOrganization
(PAHO), 2022, it also encompasses psychosocial and behavioral factors. Social health is
strongly affected by relationshipsand the interaction with other humans, with social isolation
being negatively associated with prisoner’s social health status (Umberson and Montez,
2010). In the prison context, inmates are exposed to numerous psychosocial stressors
during their incarceration, but cannot rely on the help of family and friends to cope with
them. New contacts must be made, because their capacity to cope with prison depends
largely on how they integrate socially with others in the prison “community” (De Viggiani,
2006). Subjective health refers to the individuals own view of their health and their
satisfaction with their health (Downwardet al.,2016).
Existing studies have examined various social, objective and subjective health outcomes of
sport participation among prisoners (Battaglia et al., 2015;Moscoso-S
anchez et al.,2017;
Woods et al.,2017). Starting with social health outcomes, being physically active during
imprisonment can increase self-esteem (Leberman, 2007;Griera, 2017), self-control
(Griera, 2017), and self-confidence (Leberman, 2007) as well as developinterpersonal skills
such as teamwork and communication (Leberman, 2007). Likewise, Lleix
a and Rı
´os (2015)
document that sport during imprisonment promotes communication between prisoners,
reduces conflicts and increases interactions with others. Moreover, sport participation in
prison was found to go along with enhanced social relationships and reduced aggressive
behavior (Moscoso-S
anchez et al.,2017). Furthermore, if a sport program in prison meets
the needs of prisoners, it can positively affect their system of values as well as improve the
acceptance, learning and assimilation of rules and regulations among prisoners. Also,
participating in a sport program has the potential to ease the process of finding a job after
imprisonment (Castillo-Algarra et al., 2019).
Turning to objective and subjective health outcomes, subjective well-being can increase
through sport participation in prison (Battaglia et al.,2015). This finding is echoed by
Bilderbeck et al. (2013), who document increased well-being among prisoners after taking
part in a yoga program. Amtmann and Kukay (2016) report the same significant positive
effect after participating in a fitness program. Also, prisoners’ general health status was
found to increase significantlyas a result of being physically active on a regular basis (Meek
and Lewis, 2012;Mannocci et al.,2017). Regular sport activity also goes along with a
significant decrease in prisoners’ body mass index (BMI; Elwood Martin et al.,2013).
Furthermore, prisoners were found to face less depression, stress and anxiety when
participating in a physical activity program(Buckaloo et al., 2009). Put differently, prisoners’
health status can even worsen significantlyif they do not participate in any sport during their
imprisonment (Battaglia et al.,2013). As imprisonment is generally associated with
unhealthy behaviors like physical inactivity, drugs, alcohol, smoking and violence (Fazel
and Baillargeon, 2011), the relevanceof healthy behavior such as sport increases.
While several studies have already investigated the effects of sport participation in prison
on various social and subjective health outcomes, a few shortcomings can be noted. First,
except for the systematic review of Woods et al. (2017), existing studies mostly examined
only one particular sport program or elaborated on case studies (Gallant et al.,2015).
However, different sport programs might yield different outcomes (Griera, 2017), and these
outcomes have rarely been studied systematically. Furthermore, Andrews and Andrews
(2003) claim that prisoners shouldhave a choice between several sport programs. Second,
many previous studies focused on either social health or objective/subjective health
VOL. 19 NO. 4 2023 jINTERNATIONALJOURNAL OF PRISONER HEALTH jPAGE 683
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations