Sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 24-01-1998

Judgment Date24 January 1998
Respondent StateGuatemala
CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
Procedure TypeFondo
Case TypeCaso contencioso
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
37 cases
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.408 (Panamá)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...I.D.H., C.C.B., Sentencia de 18 de agosto de 2000. Serie C No. 69. párr. 47-48; Corte I.D.H., C.B., Sentencia de 24 de enero de 1998. Serie C No. 36, párr. 47, 49, 51. 12 Corte I.D.H., C.B.V.. Sentencia de 25 de noviembre de 2000. Serie C No. 70, párr. 130. 10 57. La jurisprudencia de la Co......
  • Resolución de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 21-08-2014
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    • 21 Agosto 2014
    ...Fondo, Sentencia de 29 de julio de 1988. Serie C No. 4, párr. 155; Caso Blake Vs. Guatemala. Fondo. Sentencia de 24 de enero de 1998. Serie C No. 36, párr. 65; C.B.V.V.G.. Fondo. Sentencia de 25 de noviembre de 2000. Serie C No. 70, párr. 128; C.T.T.V.G.. Fondo, Reparaciones y C.. Sentencia......
  • Corte IDH. Caso González y otros Vs. Venezuela. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 20 de septiembre de 2021. Serie C No. 436.
    • International Law
    • 20 Septiembre 2021
    ...y la investigación de ese hecho, el Estado no es responsable por Cfr. Caso Blake Vs. Guatemala. Fondo. Sentencia de 24 de enero de 1998. Serie C No. 36, párr. y Caso Guachalá Chimbo y otros Vs. Ecuador, párr. 217. 174 175 Cfr. declaración pericial escrita de Alejandra Cristina Sapene Chapel......
  • Resolución de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 17-10-2014
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    • 17 Octubre 2014
    ...do Araguaia") Vs. Brasil, supra nota 1, párr. 171. [70] Cfr. Caso Blake Vs. Guatemala. Fondo. Sentencia de 24 de enero de 1998. Serie C No. 36, párr. 66. [71] Así, los Principios Relativos a una eficaz prevención e investigación de las ejecuciones extralegales, arbitrarias o sumarias dispon......
  • Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
  • Preface. With some comments on the amparo as an instrument of ius constitutionale commune
    • International Law
    • The civil rights injunction for the protection of fundamental rights the Latin American «amparo» proceeding. Course of lectures 2006-2008
    • 17 Enero 2023
    ...82; Case of Suárez Rosero v Ecuador (12 November 1997), Series C No 35, Merits, para 65; and Case of Blake v Guatemala (24 January 1998), Series C No 36, Merits, para 102. See the references in Cecilia Medina Quiroga, La Convención Americana: Teoría y jurisprudencia, IIDH, San José, 2003, 3......
  • Las tareas que los Estados deben cumplir
    • International Law
    • Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: su vigencia para los Estados y para los ciudadanos Parte Cuarta
    • 12 Mayo 2009
    ...16. CIDH, caso «Villagrán Morales», Serie C n.° 63, 19-11-1999; y «Velásquez Rodríguez», Serie C n.° 1, 29-7-1988. 17. Caso «Blake», Serie C n.° 36, 24-1-1998; caso «Suárez Rosero», 12 -11-1997; caso «Durand y Ugarte», Serie C n.° 68, 16-8-2000; caso «Paniagua Morales», Serie C n.° 37, 8-3-......
  • Derecho a la Integridad Personal
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 1-2011, January 2011
    • 1 Enero 2011
    ...Americana en detrimento del señor Vera Vera”. ( Caso Vera Vera , párr.78) 12 Caso Blake vs. Guatemala. Sentencia de 24 de enero de 1998. Serie C N°36, párr. 114; Caso Ibsen Cárdenas e Ibsen Peña vs. Bolivia. Sentencia de 1º de septiembre de 2010. Serie C N°217, párr. 126; Caso Gomes Lund y ......
  • Derecho a las Garantías Judiciales y Protección Judicial
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 1-2009, January 2009
    • 1 Enero 2009
    ...privada de elementos probatorios” ( Caso Tristán , párr. 146). En el Caso Blake Vs. Guatemala (Sentencia de 24 de enero de 1998. Fondo. Serie C No. 36) , relacionando la obligación de investigar con el artículo 8, la Corte ha dicho: “En consecuencia, el artículo 8.1 de la Convención America......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT