Sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 02-07-2004

Judgment Date02 July 2004
Respondent StateCosta Rica
CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
Procedure TypeExcepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas
Case TypeCaso contencioso
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
150 cases
  • Report No. 105 (2011) IACHR. Petition No. 233-04 y otras (Costa Rica)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • January 1, 2011
    ...Comerciantes), 27 de septiembre de 1999, párr. 17. 75 Corte I.D.H., Caso Herrera Ulloa Vs. Costa Rica. Sentencia de 2 de julio de 2004. Serie C No. 107, párr. R. No. 105/11 @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin-right: 1in; margin-top: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 1in } p { margin-top: 0.19in; margin-bo......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.531 (Colombia)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...Sentencia T-959/06 de 20 de noviembre de 2006, pág. 23, Anexo 41. 80 Corte I.D.H. Caso Herrera Ulloa. Sentencia de 2 de julio de 2004. Serie C No. 107, párrafos 108 y 111; Caso Ivcher Bronstein. Sentencia de 6 de febrero de 2001. Serie C No. 74, párrafos 146 y 149; Caso “La Última Tentación......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 11.699 (Venezuela)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...19 Comerciantes. Sentencia de 5 de julio de 2004. Serie C No. 109, párr. 181; Corte I.D.H., C...H.U.. Sentencia de 2 de julio de 2004. Serie C No. 107, párr. 144. 221 Corte I.D.H., C.N.A. y otros. Sentencia de 19 de enero de 1995. Serie C No. 20, párr. 85. 222 Corte I.D.H., C.J.H.S. nchez. ......
  • Report No. 59 (2007) IACHR. Petition No. 12.293 (Brasil)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • January 1, 2007
    ...Argentina del 18 de noviembre de 1997, párrafo 252. I. nota anterior. Corte I.D.H., Caso Herrera Ulloa. Sentencia de 2 de julio de 2004. Serie C No. 107, párrafo CIDH, Informe Nº 55/97, Caso 11.137, J.C.A., Argentina del 18 de noviembre de 1997, párrafo 252. I. nota anterior, párrafo 260. I......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • La tutela della libertà d'informazione nel Diritto Internazionale ed Europeo
    • International Law
    • La libertà di stampa nel Diritto Internazionale ed Europeo
    • January 1, 2012
    ...adeguate. Così la sentenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo Najafli c. Azerbaidjan, ricorso n. 2594/07, 2 ottobre 2012. 147 Serie C n. 107, par. 118. La Corte ha anche precisato che ««journalism is the primary and principal manifestation of freedom of expression of thought». 148 CC......
  • Comentario de Fondo
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 1-2009, January 2009
    • January 1, 2009
    ...se le atribuye, ya que el onus probandi corresponde a quien acusa” ( Caso Herrera Ulloa vs. Costa Rica , sentencia de 2 de Julio de 2004, Serie C N° 107, párr. 154). Asimismo, en lo que respecta al tema que nos interesa, la Corte Interamericana, citando a la Corte Europea de derechos humano......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT