Sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 03-11-1997

Judgment Date03 November 1997
Respondent StatePerú
CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
Procedure TypeFondo
Case TypeCaso contencioso
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
40 cases
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.496, 12.497 y 12.498 (México)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...C.V.R., sentencia de fondo de 29 de julio de 1988, Serie C No. 4, párr. 174. Corte I.D.H., C.C.P.. Sentencia de 3 de noviembre de 1997. Serie C No. 34, párr. 90. 246 Corte IDH. Caso Bueno A.. Sentencia sobre el fondo, reparaciones y costas de 11 de mayo de 2007. Serie C No. 164, párr. 90; C......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 11.552 (Brasil)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...de fondo de 29 de julio de 1988, Serie Comunicación No. 4, párr.. 174. Corte I.D.H., C.C.P.. Sentencia de 3 de noviembre de 1997. Serie C No. 34, párr. 90. 89 meramente compensatorio, y que la misma será otorgada en la extensión y medida suficientes para resarcir tanto los daños materiales ......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 10.686 (Guatemala)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...de 25 de noviembre de 2000. Serie C No. 70, párr. 173 citando Corte I.D.H., Caso Castillo Páez, Sentencia de 3 de noviembre de 1997. Serie C No. 34, párrs. 71-72; Corte I.D.H., Caso Neira Alegría y otros, Sentencia de 19 de enero de 1995. Serie C No. 20, párr. 76; Corte I.D.H., Caso Godínez......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 11.748 (Colombia)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...Sentencia de 25 de mayo de 2001. Serie C No. 76., párr. 200. 100 Corte I.D.H., Caso Castillo Páez. Sentencia de 3 de noviembre de 1997. Serie C No. 34, párr. 90; Corte Caso Caballero Delgado y Santana. Reparaciones (art. 63.1 Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos). Sentencia de 29 de ......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Derecho a la Integridad Personal
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 2-2011, March 2011
    • March 1, 2011
    ...7 de septiembre de 2004. Serie C Nº 114, párr. 147. 5 Ver, por ejemplo, Caso Castillo Páez vs. Perú. Sentencia de 3 de noviembre de 1997. Serie C N° 34, Punto Resolutivo Cuarto; Caso Gelman vs. Uruguay. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Serie C N° 221, párr. 133; y, Caso Gomes Lund y otro......
  • Preface. With some comments on the amparo as an instrument of ius constitutionale commune
    • International Law
    • The civil rights injunction for the protection of fundamental rights the Latin American «amparo» proceeding. Course of lectures 2006-2008
    • January 17, 2023
    ...C No 45, Dissenting opinion of judge Antônio A Cançado Trindade, para 18. 8 See IACtHR, Case of Castillo Páez v Perú (3 November 1997), Series C No 34, Merits, para 82. 9 That is why Anamari Garro Vargas believes that it «is not the same to state that the system of effective legal remedies ......
  • Derecho a las Garantías Judiciales y Protección Judicial
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 1-2009, January 2009
    • January 1, 2009
    ...las garantías judiciales y a la protección judicial. Así, en el Caso Castillo Páez vs. Perú (Sentencia de 3 de Noviembre de 2007, Fondo, Serie C N° 34) señaló que: “El segundo argumento se reiere a la formulación de un derecho no existente en la Convención Americana aunque pueda corresponde......
  • La utilización del Derecho Internacional en la condena de Alberto Fujimori: el necesario y fructífero dialogo entre los avances de lo internacional y los importantes aportes de la jurisdicción nacional
    • International Law
    • Derechos Humanos y lucha contra la impunidad. El caso Fujimori
    • January 1, 2011
    ...el capítulo de "Delitos contra la Humanidad". Asimismo, véase: Caso Castillo Páez vs. Perú. Fondo. Sentencia de 3 de noviembre de 1997. Serie C No. 34. [24] Los hechos sucedieron el 14 de marzo de 1991 cuando una patrulla del Ejército del cuartel militar de Pampa Cangallo ingresó a la local......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT