Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2019-0426 of WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, April 11, 2019 (case Robertet SA v. Domain Maybe For Sale c/o Dynadot / Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot)

Resolution DateApril 11, 2019
Issuing OrganizationWIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
DecisionTransfer
DominioGeneric Domains

ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION

Robertet SA v. Domain Maybe For Sale c/o Dynadot / Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot

Case No. D2019-0426

1. The Parties

The Complainant is Robertet SA of Grasse, France, represented by Novagraaf France, France.

The Respondents are Domain Maybe For Sale c/o Dynadot of San Mateo, California, United States of America (“USA”) / Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot of San Mateo, California, USA.

2. The Domain Names and Registrar

The disputed domain names [robertetgroupe.com] and [rrobertetgroupe.com] are registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).

3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on February 22, 2019. On February 22, 2019, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain names. On February 28, 2019, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondents are listed as the registrants and providing the contact details.

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondents of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on March 4, 2019. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was March 24, 2019. The Respondents did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on March 25, 2019.

The Center appointed David Perkins as the sole panelist in this matter on March 28, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.

4. Consolidation

4.1 The Registrar’s said email of February 28, 2019 identified the registrant of the disputed domain name [robertgroupe.com] as Domain Maybe for Sale c/o Dynadot, and the registrant of the disputed domain name [rrobertgroupe.com] as Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot.

4.2 Both the disputed domain names were created the same day, namely January 29, 2019 and the Registrar, Dynadot LLC, is common to both.

4.3 The [WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition] (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), [section 4.11.2] lists the range of factors, typically present in some combination, as useful to determining whether consolidation is appropriate. In this case, at least the factors (i) to (v) of that section are satisfied and, in the circumstances, the Panel agrees with the Center’s preliminary assessment in its email to...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT