President Obama's legacy: the Iran Nuclear Agreement?

AuthorSterio, Milena
PositionBarack Obama - New Beginnings, Resets & Pivots: The International Legal Practice of the Obama Administration

Iran, the United States, and several world super-powers signed a historic nuclear agreement over the summer of 2015. The Agreement is a comprehensive plan of action, with an unprecedented level of minutia and detail regarding Iran's commitment to curb its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of United Nations-imposed sanctions against Iran. This Agreement, if it is successfully implemented, may represent President Obama's most significant foreign policy achievement and may become the most important element of President Obama's legacy. This Article will examine the Iran Nuclear Agreement by focusing on the events which led to the imposition of sanctions against Iran and to the ultimate negotiation of this Agreement, the structure of the Agreement; this Article will also discuss the most significant advantages and disadvantages of this somewhat risky deal. This Article will conclude that the Iran Nuclear Agreement could become one of President Obama's biggest foreign policy accomplishments in the Middle East.

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. PRELUDE: WHAT LEAD TO THE AGREEMENT? III. BASICS OF THE AGREEMENT IV. (DIS)ADVANTAGES OF THE AGREEMENT V. POST-AGREEMENT: IMPLEMENTATION AND OBAMA'S LEGACY? VI. CONCLUSION I. INTRODUCTION

Iran and several world super-powers, including the United States, signed a historic nuclear agreement over the summer of 2015. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action [hereinafter "Agreement"] was signed on July 14, 2015 in Vienna by the United States, Great

Britain, France, Germany, China, Russia, the European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and Iran. (1) It is over one hundred pages long and has five annexes; some commentators have indicated that the level of minutia and detail in this agreement is unprecedented in terms of other nuclear nonproliferation agreements throughout history. (2) Under the terms of the Agreement, Iran agreed to curb its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of United Nations-imposed sanctions against Iran. (3) The Agreement, if successfully implemented, may represent one of President Obama's most significant foreign policy achievements and may become a cornerstone of Obama's legacy. This Article will examine the Iran Nuclear Agreement by focusing on the events which led to the imposition of sanctions against Iran and to the ultimate negotiation of this Agreement (II), the structure of the Agreement (III), and will discuss the most significant advantages and disadvantages of this somewhat risky deal (IV). This Article will conclude that the Iran Nuclear Agreement could become one of President Obama's biggest accomplishments regarding foreign policy (V).

  1. PRELUDE: WHAT LEAD TO THE AGREEMENT?

    Iran signed the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT) in 1968 as a non-nuclear weapons state and ratified the NPT in 1970. (4) However, in the 1970s even as a member of the NPT, Iran began developing nuclear technology when the United States' Atoms for Peace program began providing assistance to Iran, led by the American-supported Shah. (5)

    Iran's nuclear program was temporarily halted starting in 1979, when the Iranian Revolution took place, and much of Iran's nuclear talent fled the country in the wake of the Revolution. (6) The nuclear program continued to be suspended after the Revolution, because the new Iranian leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, was initially opposed to nuclear technology, and because Iran was engaged in a costly war with Iraq from 1980 to 1988, which effectively disabled Iran from pursuing any type of nuclear technology. (7)

    In the late 1980s, Iran revived its nuclear weapon program, with assistance from Pakistan, China, and Russia. Pakistan entered into a bilateral agreement with Iran in 1992, China in 1990, and Russia in 1992 and 1995. (8) While Iran has always maintained that its nuclear work was peaceful and that any nuclear programs undertaken were for civilian purposes, (9) United States' intelligence agencies suspected Iran of using the civilian nuclear program as a cover for clandestine nuclear weapons development. (10)

    In August 2002, an Iranian dissident group publicly revealed the existence of two undeclared nuclear facilities, the Arak heavy-water production facility and the Natanz enrichment facility. (11) Following this revelation, in February 2003, Iranian President Mohammad Khatami acknowledged the existence of these facilities but argued that Iran undertook "small-scale enrichment experiments" to produce low-enriched uranium for nuclear power plants. (12) After the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors visited Natanz, and other sites, they concluded, in a May 2003 report, that Iran violated the terms of previous nuclear agreements. (13) In June 2003, Iran entered into diplomatic negotiations with France, Germany, and the United Kingdom; the United States, however, refused to participate. (14) These negotiations resulted in the Tehran Declaration in October 2003. (15) The Declaration, signed by France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Iran, provided that Iran would cooperate fully with the IAEA and temporarily suspend all uranium enrichment. (16) The Tehran Declaration was followed by the Paris Agreement in November 2004, according to which Iran agreed to temporarily suspend both enrichment and conversion activities, including the manufacture and operation of centrifuges. (17)

    The Paris Agreement fell apart after the election of hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in August 2005. (18) Iran notified the IAEA that it would resume uranium conversion and enrichment at several nuclear sites; prompting the IAEA Board of Governors to refer Iran to the Security Council. (19) Between 2006 and 2010, the Security Council adopted six different resolutions concerning Iran's nuclear program; these resolutions demanded that Iran cease enrichment activities and imposed sanctions, including freezing the assets of certain Iranian individuals and companies. (20)

    In September 2009, President Obama, revealed the existence of an underground enrichment facility in Fordow and argued that "Iran's decision to build yet another nuclear facility without notifying the IAEA represents a direct challenge to the basic compact at the center of the non-proliferation regime." (21) The relationship between the United States and Iran remained stalled until March 2013, when the United States began a series of secret bilateral talks with Iranian officials in Oman. (22) While public information about the nature of these talks has been largely unavailable, one can presume that the Obama Administration was hoping to establish more candid and forthcoming communication with Iranian leadership, paving the way for more formal nuclear disarmament negotiations after the Iranian elections, which had been scheduled for June 2013. (23) In June 2013, Hassan Rouhani, a more moderate and pragmatic politician, was elected president of Iran. (24) In August 2013, three days after his inauguration, Rouhani called for a resumption of serious negotiations with the West on the Iranian nuclear program. (25) In September 2013, Obama and Rouhani had a telephone conversation, the first high-level contact between the United States and Iranian leaders since 1979. (26) Additionally, Secretary of State John Kerry met with Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, signaling that the two countries had begun to negotiate and perhaps cooperate. (27)

    After several rounds of negotiations, an interim agreement on the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT