Opinión Consultiva OC-22/16 de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 26-02-2016
| Court | Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
| Date | 26 February 2016 |
| Respondent State | Panamá |
| Case Type | Opinión consultiva |
| Publication | Serie A No. 22. |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
64 cases
-
Report IACHR. Case No. 12.256, 12.258 y 12.307 (Venezuela)
...Sramek vs. Austria. Serie A, Nº 84; Campbell and Fell vs. United Kingdom. Serie A, Nº 39; Ringeinsen vs. Austria. Serie A, Nº 13; E.v.N.. Serie A, Nº 22; y S. vs. S.. Serie A, Nº 78. 135 Así, por ejemplo, en el Caso Piersack v. Belgium. Sentencia del 1º de octubre de 1982. Serie A, Nº 53. 2......
-
Report IACHR. Case No. 11.699 (Venezuela)
...Case of Campbell and Fell v. United Kingdom, Series A, No. 39; ECHR, C. of Ringeinsen v. Austria, Series A, No. 13; ECHR, C.o.E.v....N., Series A, No. 22; ECHR, C.o.S.v.S., Series A, No. 78. 210 Véase, C..o..R., Le C ompte, V..L. and De Meyre, todos citados por VAN DIJK/VAN HOOF, THEORY AND......
-
Report IACHR. Case No. 12.489 (Venezuela)
...Sramek vs. Austria, Serie A, Nº 84; Campbell and Fell vs. United Kingdom, Serie A, N 39; Ringeinsen vs. Austria, Serie A, Nº 13; E.v.N., Serie A, Nº 22; y Schiesser vs. Switzerland, Serie A, Nº 78. 123 Así, por ejemplo, en el Caso Piersak, Sentencia del 1º de octubre de 1982, Serie A, Nº 5.......
-
Report No. 196 (2021) IACHR. Petition No. 466-13 (Guatemala)
...esta decisión e incluirla en su Informe Anual a la Asamblea General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos. 6 Corte I.D.H. Opinión Consultiva OC-22/16 de 26 de febrero de 2016. Titularidad de derechos de las personas jurídicas en el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos (interpre......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Crónica de Derechos Humanos (Julio 2015 - Diciembre 2016)
...44, 46, y 62.3 de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos, así como del artículo 8.1 A y B del Protocolo de San Salvador). Opinión Consultiva OC-22/16 de 26 de febrero de 2016. Serie A No. 22 6. Los mecanismos de protección de la Unión Africana A) COMISIÓN AFRICANA DE LOS DERECHOS HU......
-
Estudio jurisprudencial sobre la aplicación del control difuso de convencionalidad en Bolivia
...Americana sobre De- rechos Humanos). Opinión Consultiva OC-23/17 de 15 de noviembre de 2017. Serie A No. 23, párr. 28. 47 Cfr. Opinión Consultiva OC-22/16, «Titularidad de derechos de las sonas jurídicas en el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos», de 26 de febrero de 2016. Serie A, n......
-
El desarrollo y uso discursivo de los principios rectores sobre empresas y derechos humanos en América Latina
...46 and 62(3) of the American Convention on Human Rights, as well as of Article 8(1)(A) and (B) of the Protocol of San Salvador). Advisory Opinion OC-22/16 of February 26, 2016. Series A N.° 22, paras. 49-50, 63; I/A Court H.R., Rights and guarantees of children in the context of migration a......
-
Derechos Humanos de las Personas Morales. Personas Jurídicas no son titulares de Derechos Humanos en el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos (en adelante CoIDH) vs. las Personas Morales si tienen Derechos Humanos (en adelante SCJN).
...DE TESIS 360/2013. Consultable en http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/ConsultaTematica/PaginasPub/DetallePub.aspx?AsuntoID=155733 · OPINIÓN CONSULTIVA OC-22/16 DE 26 DE FEBRERO DE 2016 SOLICITADA POR LA REPÚBLICA DE PANAMÁ. Consultable en · SOLICITUD DE OPINION CONSULTIVA DEL GOBIERNO DE LA REPUBLICA D......
Get Started for Free