For over four decades, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has been committed to a set of principles geared towards establishing an energy-secure future for the world we live in. Two fundamental objectives have formed the cornerstone of its approach: maintaining oil market stability and striving to attain a fair price for the oil it produces. These goals have been intrinsic to the Organization's aims and objectives since its formation in Baghdad, Iraq in September 1960. And although OPEC has always professed that the management of the oil market should not be up to its members alone, it has made important policy decisions that have brought the industry back from the brink of a number of serious crises and has always taken this inherent "managerial" responsibility very seriously.
In fact, throughout its history, OPEC has found itself to be in the pivotal role in an often difficult balancing act- trying to guarantee adequate revenues for the producers, companies and investors alike while attempting to satisfy the needs of the consumers, especially in providing uninterrupted supplies of oil at a fair and equitable price.
It is no secret that over the years many producing and consuming countries have advocated an international oil market free of controls and outside influence.
As the last two decades or so have shown, that approach simply does not work-certainly not with something as diverse and complex as the global oil sector. Of all the commodities traded on world markets every day, oil is undoubtedly the most unpredictable and volatile. The price of international crude can crash or soar overnight. It can be affected by a multitude of factors and not solely by supply-and-demand-related fundamentals. Hype and speculation have also proved to be extremely problematic. Take the Middle East crisis for example-just the mere suggestion that the United States intended launching military action against Iraq caused the price of crude to surge in a few weeks by something like $10 a barrel, even though global supplies were more than adequate. There was no basis in the supply-and-demand picture for such a hike, yet the uncertainty of what might happen drove prices higher. So to leave such a sensitive trading environment to its own devices would, in our opinion, be a sure recipe for disaster .
However, it must be stressed that oil market management is not something new. If we look back to the early years of the twentieth century, we can see that the first moves towards attempting to balance supply and demand, which ultimately affected prices, were made by the United States Texas Railroad Commission in the early 1930s. Around the same time, the United States Congress endorsed the establishment of the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
Both entities had the prime function of controlling production, with a view to maintaining a certain price level. Later, the renowned "Seven Sisters"--a group of major oil companies--took a stronger hold on the manipulation of output and pricing, sparking the birth of OPEC...