Off‐Market Buybacks in Australia: Evidence of Abnormal Trading around Key Dates

AuthorChloe Choy Yeing Ho,Hue Hwa Au Yong,Christine Brown
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12037
Date01 December 2014
Published date01 December 2014
Off-Market Buybacks in Australia:
Evidence of Abnormal Trading
around Key Dates*
HUE HWA AUYONG,CHRISTINE BROWN AND
CHLOE CHOY YEING HO
Department of Banking and Finance, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
ABSTRACT
Off-market share buybacks in Australia are often structured with the buyback
price comprising a large dividend component (which may carry imputation
tax credits) and a small capital component. This unique structure has the
consequence that institutions on low tax rates stand to benef‌it most from
selling shares into the buyback. In this article, we explore evidence of abnor-
mal trading activities around key dates in the conduct of off-market buybacks
and investigate the drivers of these activities. We f‌ind evidence of abnormal
trading activities around the initial announcement and the f‌inal announce-
ment dates of the buyback. The signif‌icant differences in abnormal volumes
between the buybacks with and without imputation tax credits highlight the
importance of tax motivations in explaining abnormal trading activities in
the shares of companies conducting off-market buybacks, and are consistent
with observed buying pressure around the announcement of the buyback.
I. INTRODUCTION
The market reaction to the announcement of a share repurchase has been the
focus of many studies since the seminal work of Dann (1981) and Vermaelen
(1981) in the US. Other countries have been slower to enact legislation to allow
share repurchases, but all studies conducted to date show that the market
reaction to a share repurchase announcement tends to be positive. In Australia,
the liberalization of buyback regulations occurred in December 1995, and since
then, share buybacks have become an important capital management tool used
by companies to return cash to investors.1Companies may buy back shares
either on-market or off-market. On-market buybacks (equivalent to open-
market repurchases in the US) are carried out on the Australian Securities
* This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Project
funding scheme (project number DP0878537). We thank Anne Ritter for her excellent research
assistance.
1 Australian companies were f‌irst allowed to undertake share repurchases in 1989. The First
Corporate Law Simplif‌ication Bill was enacted in December 1995, leading to simplif‌ication of
the processes and regulations that govern buybacks.
bs_bs_banner
International Review of Finance, 14:4, 2014: pp. 551–585
DOI: 10.1111/irf‌i.12037
© 2014 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2014
Exchange (ASX) in the ordinary course of trading. The focus of this study is on
equal-access share buybacks (equivalent to tender offers in the US context), a
type of off-market buyback where all shareholders are invited by the company
to tender some or all of their shares into the buyback.2
Prior event studies typically investigate the market reaction to the announce-
ment of a buyback by studying returns in a narrow window around the
announcement date. Other important dates in the buyback process are gener-
ally ignored in these studies (see, Brown 2007). Our study is different. We focus
on two key dates, the initial announcement date and the f‌inal announcement
date, and investigate abnormal trading activities and abnormal returns around
these dates. There are considerable uncertainties surrounding the f‌inal details of
the buyback that are not resolved until the buyback closes. For example, the
f‌inal buyback price (in a Dutch auction tender) and the extent of the under- or
over-subscription are not known until the company announces the outcomes
on the f‌inal announcement date. By investigating abnormal returns and
volumes around the f‌inal announcement date, we can document whether there
are abnormal trading activities around the closing date and investigate possible
causes of abnormal returns and volumes.
Off-market buybacks in Australia offer tax advantages to low marginal tax-
rate investors (which are mainly institutions). These tax advantages can be
captured by buying shares on announcement of the buyback and selling these
same shares back to the company through the buyback offer. This observation
suggests the existence of tax-induced abnormal trading activities around the
initial announcement date. Often, the repurchases are over-subscribed and
institutions that have bought up shares on the initial announcement are unable
to sell all the acquired shares into the buyback. They subsequently sell these
‘excess’ shares when the f‌inal outcome is announced on the completion date.
The initial purchasing creates buying pressure and the selling of ‘excess’ shares
on the completion date creates selling pressure. These activities are associated
with observed abnormal returns and abnormal volumes around both these key
dates. As compared with on-market buybacks, the observed abnormal trading
activity and any changes in market structure (such as changes in bid-ask spread)
can be attributed to investor trading activity rather than f‌irms’ own trading
activities.
To further substantiate our hypothesis of tax-induced trading, we use the net
buying pressure (NBP) variable to directly test our conjecture that investors are
buying shares on announcement in order to participate in the buyback, and
selling unsuccessfully tendered shares after the f‌inal announcement. We also
investigate liquidity around the key dates using the Amihud illiquidity measure
and the effective half-spread measure, which offer convincing evidence of
increases in market liquidity around the initial announcement date and some
evidence for increased liquidity around the f‌inal announcement date. Our setting
2 Within off-market buybacks, there are four categories of buyback: minimum holding, selec-
tive, employee, and equal access.
International Review of Finance
552 © 2014 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2014
provides a unique opportunity to investigate the effects on trading activity and
market structure of tax-induced trading of large institutional shareholders.
This article makes four main contributions to the literature on share repur-
chases. First, it documents tax-induced abnormal trading activity around two
key dates in the off-market buyback process in Australia. Second, our approach
allows for the separation of the information effect and the tax effect on abnor-
mal returns and volumes. The results provide direct evidence that abnormal
trading is higher for buybacks with larger tax benef‌its, thus supporting a tax-
induced trading effect. This adds to our understanding of the importance of tax
effects in company capital raisings. Third, by studying two key dates, we capture
the information effects for the whole buyback period, and provide direct evi-
dence of investor portfolio rebalancing around buybacks when information is
released on the f‌inal announcement date. Fourth, we link the abnormal trading
activities to observed changes in liquidity variables around the key dates,
showing that increases in market liquidity are associated with tax-induced
trading activities.
The remainder of this article is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a
literature review of off-market buybacks. Section 3 provides a description of
hypotheses, data and method. The results and discussions of the analyses are
presented in Section 4. We summarize the article in Section 5.
II. BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Overview of the taxation treatment of
off-market buybacks in Australia
Interaction between Australian taxation law3and company law has led to the
unique taxation treatment of off-market buybacks. When a company buys back
its own shares, the consideration paid to a participant (the buyback price) is
divided into a dividend component and a capital component. The company
determines the capital component after consultation with the Commissioner of
Taxation.4The remainder is the deemed dividend component.5Alternatively,
the entire buyback price can be set as capital component.
3 Taxation treatment provisions are provided in the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) (ITAA
1936).
4 The Commissioner of Taxation reviews the request from the company for the dividend and
capital split in the light of balance sheet constraints, retained earnings, and the balance of a
company’s franking account. The Tax Commissioner then makes a class ruling on the income
tax consequences of the buyback that are effective for the f‌inancial year in which the buyback
takes place.
5 This is a simplif‌ication of the actual treatment, which changed in 2004. Prior to 2004, for tax
purposes the capital component (sale price) of shares sold in an off-market buyback was
calculated as the difference between the dividend amount and the buyback price From 2004,
this was changed such that the capital component for tax purposes was calculated as the
difference between the pre-announcement market price of the share and the dividend
amount.
Off-Market Buybacks in Australia
553© 2014 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex