National Governance System, Corporate Ownership, and Roles of Outside Directors: A Corporate Governance Bundle Perspective
| Author | Hongjin Zhu,Toru Yoshikawa,Pengji Wang |
| Date | 01 May 2014 |
| Published date | 01 May 2014 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12050 |
National Governance System, Corporate
Ownership, and Roles of Outside Directors:
A Corporate Governance Bundle Perspective
Toru Yoshikawa,* Hongjin Zhu, and Pengji Wang
Manuscript Type: Conceptual
Research Questions/Issues: We explore why and how the different combinations of governance practices at national level,
such as the legal system, conduct codes, and capital markets, and at firm level, such as various types of controlling
shareholders, enable or constrain outside directors to engage in their monitoring and resource provision roles. Building
upon such analysis, we develop a new taxonomy of corporate governance systems according to the different configurations
of a set of interdependent governance characteristics, including national governance mechanisms, identity of block share-
holders, and functions of outside directors.
Research Insights: This study enriches the growing body of research on governance complementarity and substitution by
highlighting the role of bundles of governance practices in influencing directors’ engagement in governance behavior, and
consequently advancing our understanding of variation in corporate governance systems across and within countries.
Theoretical/Academic Implications: This paper demonstrates that the roles of outside directors depend on the interaction
between a bundle of governance mechanisms rather than any individual mechanisms. The paper also goes beyond the
traditional governancemodels based on the national context and highlights that interdependencies of corporate governance
practices play an importantrole in explaining the diversity and variation of corporate governance arrangements across firms
in both industrialized economies and emerging markets.
Practitioner/Policy Implications: This paper provides insights to policymakers by suggesting that not all the governance
bundles are conducive to managerial monitoring and resource provision by outside directors.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Board of Directors, Ownership Mechanisms, Agency Theory, Resource Dependence
Theory
INTRODUCTION
Given the many corporate scandals in recent years (e.g.,
Enron, WorldCom, etc.), increased debate on and inter-
est in the roles and effectiveness of outside directors has
emerged in academia, industry, and regulatory institutions
in both developed and emerging economies (e.g., Carter &
Lorsch, 2004; CSRC, 2001). The vast bulk of research on the
antecedents of directors’ behavior conceptualizes outside
directors as an independent governance mechanism whose
efficacy is determined by directors’ incentives and ability to
engage in two primary functions: monitoring the manage-
ment and providing resources/counseling to the manage-
ment (Adams & Ferreira, 2007; Hillman & Dalziel, 2003;
Sundaramurthy & Lewis, 2003). Agency theorists contend
that independence of outside directors brings greater trans-
parency, efficiency, and accountability to managerial
monitoring (Fama & Jensen, 1983). Resource dependence
theorists view outside directors as critical resource provid-
ers who use their human and social capital to provideadvice
and counseling, connections to other organizations, access
to external resources, and legitimacy to the firm (Pfeffer &
Salancik, 1978). Theoretically, the presence of outside direc-
tors should lead to better firm performance, but the empiri-
cal findings about the performance implication of such
directors are mixed (e.g., Dalton,Daily,Ellstrand, & Johnson,
1998; Finkelstein & D’Aveni, 1994; Peng, 2004; Westphal,
1999).
One explanation for the divergent findings is that those
studies focus on outside directors per se, without consider-
ing their relationships with other governance mechanisms.
To the extent that various corporate governance practices
*Address for correspondence: Toru Yoshikawa, Lee Kong Chian School of Business,
Singapore ManagementUniversity, 50 Stamford Road,Singapore 178899. Tel: +65 6828
0756; Fax: +65 6828 0777; E-mail: toru@smu.edu.sg
252
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2014, 22(3): 252–265
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
doi:10.1111/corg.12050
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations