IP Litigation in Africa

AuthorDarren Olivier
PositionHead of Brand Enforcement, Bowman Gilfillan, South Africa
Pages14-15
Africa, a continent of 54 countries, with a popula-
tion of around one billion, produces relatively few
reported cases of IP-related disputes. Apart from a
steady stream of IP decisions emanating from
South Africa, there is a dearth of information from
the rest of the continent and such information, if
and when available, tends to reach only those in
the know. Most IP practitioners are, therefore, un-
aware of how IP is enforced on the continent. As a
consequence, IP investment in Africa has been
treated with some apprehension, or there has been
an assumption that effective IP rights enforcement
is not a prerequisite for doing business there.
However, there is evidence that this is changing.
Online media, such as
Afro-IP
, World Trade Mark
Review, Managing Intellectual Property and the
WIPO Magazine, have stepped up efforts to facili-
tate access to information on the IP situation in
Africa. The cases below are but a few of those that
have recently come to light. Whether it is that
more is now known about African IP rights en-
forcement or that its effectiveness is improving is
not altogether clear. However, one thing is certain
– that IP dispute resolution is alive and well in most
economically vibrant economies on the continent.
Ethiopia’s coffee
In an IP dispute with Starbucks over U.S. registra-
tion and use of trademarks for its premium coffee
beans, Ethiopia recognized an opportunity to ne-
gotiate with the company and settled the dispute
in an innovative way that may have long-term
benefits for its people. Instead of attempting to ex-
tract cash in the form of royalty payments, the set-
tlement aimed to increase Ethiopia’s brand recog-
nition and the demand for its coffee beans in a bid
to generate future wealth for the country.
According to the settlement, Ethiopia will select
the global distributors for its coffee and set the
conditions for sale. Ethiopia charges no royalty fees
for coffee distribution licenses but, in return, asks
distributors to market each type of coffee under its
particular brand name. (See “Making the Origin
Count: Two Coffees, WIPO Magazine 5/2007.)
South Africa – Trademarks
on the front line
No less than four trademark cases reached the
Supreme Court of Appeal, South Africa’s high-
est commercial court, in 2009, and a significant
number of other cases appeared in the law re-
ports of the High Court. This is indicative of the
ongoing healthy debate on IP issues in South
Africa, where information on IP enforcement in
the country has become increasingly accessi-
ble, in particular in the areas related to coun-
terfeiting and domain names.
In 2010, the country will be hosting the FIFA
World Cup football tournament, whose revenues
directly depend on the country’s ability to ade-
quately protect the IP rights of its official spon-
sors. There have already been a number of cases
of international brand owners effectively enforc-
ing the ambush marketing provisions of the
Merchandise Marks Act 1943, as amended. (See
“Defending its turf: FIFA combats Ambush
Marketing,” WIPO Magazine 4/2009.)
No passing off in
Namibia
The strength of Namibia’s IP system was tested
recently in the passing off case of Guido-Dirk
Gonschorek and Others v Asmus and Another
(SA 11/2007) [2008] NASC 3 (15 April 2008). The
case arose after Asmus sold part of its ASCO
branded business (car hire, panel-beating, prop-
erties and yacht chartering) to Gonschorek.
Asmus sued successfully both on the grounds of
passing off and under the Close Corporation Act
IP LITIGATION
IN AFRICA
FEBRUARY 2010
14
This article by Darren Olivier, Head of Brand Enforcement, Bowman Gilfillan, South Africa, highlights
some of the more recent IP dispute developments across the African continent. Mr. Olivier is a co-founder
of the
Afro-IP
blog, which publishes regular articles and updates on IP in Africa.
IP LITIGATION COSTS
Some 15 million people in Ethiopia depend on the coffee sector, which generates
60 percent of the country’s export earnings.
Courtesy USAid
Courtesy EIPO

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT