Judicial control of public administration in Europeean Union countries

AuthorPopescu Doina
PositionJuridical and Public Administration Sciences, Public Law Department, University of Pitesti, Pitesti, Romania
Pages143-149
AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, www.juridicalj ournal.univagora.ro
ISSN 1843-570X, E-ISSN 2067-7677
No. 1 (2013), pp.143-149
143
JUDICIAL CONTROL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN
EUROPEEAN UNION COUNTRIES
D. Popescu
Doina Popescu
Juridical and Public Administration Sciences, Public Law Department,
University of Piteti, Piteti, Romania
*Correspondence: Doina Popescu, University of Piteti, 1 Târgul din Vale St., Piteti,
Romania
E-mail: dopopescu@yahoo.com
Abstract
The European Union Member States governments are subject the following forms of
control: internal control over government, judicial review and external review our
jurisdictional nature.
In other EU countries, we also speak of duality of jurisdiction: the Supreme Court
does not have jurisdiction to review decisions of certain courts with special competence in
administrative matters.
Meanwhile, civil liability law has expanded government and judicial review provisions
of the Government. Jurisprudence of the State insists on legal personality and its civil liability
provisions against its officials. In a number of states, special jurisdictions are responsible for
checking accounts.
In all European countries, ordinary courts also have wider powers or less extended in
contentious relations with the government.
Comparative analysis of the institution of administrative courts in different states of
the European Union concluded that the most important issues: accessibility, speed and
effectiveness of judicial review.
Say that work is confined only a few EU countries because it is still the states that will
affect casting the future “United Europe” until the new democracies will consolidate and
secondly, the actual difficulties of documentation, even if sporadic information may be
obtained on these states.
In these Member States whose institutions I referred to, are not always clear that
information can be found on the situation in all that was done a comparative analysis and
that an institution or another has become over time in a state or another, it usually it is given
due attention. Thus, if we say, traditional constitutional monarchy, Britain thought leads us to
say whether the Ombudsman, Sweden comes to mind, and if we say contentious
Administrative whole doctrine is unanimous in its origin in the French model.
Keywords: EU countries, duality of jurisdiction, special jurisdictions, jurisdictional
control, administrative jurisdictions.
Introduction
The mechanisms of administrative control differ from a country to another. Nowadays,
there is a wide control range which is common to all Occidental European countries but with
different forms from a country to another.
In the European Union Member States, the administrations obey, as shown at the
beginning of the previous chapter, the following control forms: internal control over
administration, jurisdictional control and non-jurisdictional external control.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT