Report No. 110 (2020) IACHR. Petition No. 735-07 (Mexico)

Case Number735-07
Year2020
Report Number110
Respondent StateMéxico
Case TypeFriendly Settlements
CourtInter-American Comission of Human Rights
Alleged VictimIsmael Mondragón Molina
REPORT No. 110/20
PETITION 735-07
REPORT ON FRIENDLY SETTLEMENT
ISMAEL MONDRAGON MOLINA
MEXICO
Approved electronically by the C. on J...9., 2020.
OEA/Ser.L/V/II.
D.. 120
9 J. 2020
Original: Spanish
Cite as IACHR, Report No. 110/2020, P. 735-07 . Friendly Settlement. Isma el M......
.
M.. M.. J...9., 2020.
www.cidh.org
1
REPORT No. 110/20
PETITION 735-07
FRIENDLY SETTLEMENT
I..M.M...
.
M...
.
J..9., 20201
I. SUMMARY AND RELEVANT PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF THE FRIENDLY SETTLEMENT
PROCESS
1. On J.....6., 2007, the Inter-American Commission on H.n Rights (hereinafter the
“C.” or “IACHR”) received the petition presented by Mr. E.M.....B. (hereinafter
“the petitioners” or “the petitioner party”). In which the international responsibility of the M...S. was
alleged for the failure to investigate the death of his 1-year-old and 11-month-old son, I..M.ndragón
(hereinafter the “victim”), due to medical negligence. S., attorney M.el Nava Alvarado became a
co-petitioner.
2. On October 26, 2012, the C. transmitted to the M. S. a copy of the pertinent
parts of the petition presented by Mr. E.M.gón, according to Article 30 (2) of its Rules of Procedure.
On August 18, 2016, the S. expressed its willingness to initiate a friendly settlement process, an offer that
was accepted by the petitioner on October 21, 2016.
3. In the framework of the 159 Period of Sessions of the IACHR, on December 5, 2016, the parties
signed a memorandum of understanding in which they expressed their i nterest in reaching the signing of a
friendly settlement agreement (FSA). In the document, the parties defined the work methodology for the
negotiation and the claims related to a) rehabilitation measures, b) satisfaction measures, c) guarantees of non-
repetition, and d) financial compensation.
4. On M. 14, 2018, the parties signed a Friendly Settlement A.eement whose
implementation has been supervised by the C.. In the same agreement, the parties jointly requested
the immediate approval of the FSA.
5. On the other hand, in the present friendly settlement report, as established in Article 49 of the
American Convention and Article 40.5 of the C.'s Rules of Procedure, a review of the facts alleged by
the petitioner is made, and the agreement signed on M. 14, 2018, by the petitioner and the representatives
of the M..S. is transcrib ed. L., the agreement signed by the pa rties and the publication of this
report in the Annual Report of the IACHR to the General Assembly of the Organization of American S.s is
approved.
II. THE ALLEGED FACTS
6. The petitioners alleged that on December 15, 2004, the boy I..M. ndragón M., one
year and 11 months old, had undergone cranial surgery at the Children's Hospital of the S. of Sonora, a public
institution, and he would have died after it due to medical negligence. In this sense, the National C.
of H.n Rights would have carried out an investigation in the file CEDH / II / 22/01/050/2005, in which it
concluded that "malpractice in medical care granted by Dr. J...M..a..O..V.ez was observed”. Sinc e
there was no merit or evidence that alterations were made to the facial mass, the area of competenc e of the
maxillofacial surgeon and that the craniosynostosis performed on the child was a surgery typical of the field of
a pediatric neurosurgeon.
7. A., the petitioners alleged that the investigation would have found that the type of
disease suffered by Ismael M.’s must have been operated on early, since the passage of time increased
1 C..J..H., a M. national, did not participate in the discussion and decision in this case, under Ar ticle
17.2.a) of the IACHR Rules of Procedure.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT