Inequality beneath the surface: a Belgian case study on structural discrimination in the workplace and the role of organizational structure, culture and policies

Date26 February 2024
Pages1130-1149
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-09-2023-0295
Published date26 February 2024
AuthorDavid De Coninck,Laure Verhulst
Inequality beneath the surface:
a Belgian case study on structural
discrimination in the workplace
and the role of organizational
structure, culture and policies
David De Coninck and Laure Verhulst
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Abstract
Purpose The context of a long-standing research tradition, discrimination has emerged as a critical factor
contributing to inequalities within the labor market. While existing studies have primarily focused on overt
discrimination during the recruitment and selection process, influenced by biases, attitudes, or stereotypes,
there remains a significant knowledge gap regarding discrimination within the workplace and its underlying
structural dimensions. This article aims to address this gap by examining the impact of organizational culture,
structure and policies on workplace discrimination, with a particular emphasis on women and ethnic
minorities.
Design/methodology/approach Utilizing a case study strategy centered around a Belgian branch of a
multinational professional service agency, data was gathered through ten semi-structured in-depth interviews
conducted with employees representing various organizational levels.
Findings The findings reveal that organizational culture, structure and policies may pose inherent risks in
perpetuating discrimination throughout individualsprofessional trajectories. Furthermore, it becomes
apparent that, albeit often unconscious, these elements exhibit biases against women and ethnic minorities.
Social implications Given the unintentional nature of structural discrimination, it is crucial to foster
increased awareness and understanding of these dynamics.
Originality/value The originality of this research article lies in its focus on addressing a critical knowledge
gap in the existing research tradition on discrimination in the labor market. While previous studies have
primarily concentrated on overt discrimination during recruitment and selection, this article delves into the
often overlooked area of discrimination within the workplace itself. It explores the intricate interplay of
organizational culture, structure and policies in perpetuating discrimination, particularly against women and
ethnic minorities. By utilizing a case study approach within a multinational professional service agency in
Belgium, the research uncovers hidden biases and unconscious elements contributing to structur al
discrimination. This emphasis on understanding unintentional discrimination adds a novel dimension to the
discourse on workplace inequalities.
Keywords Discrimination, Inequality, Workplace, Organizational structure, Organizational culture,
Organizational policies
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Diversity and inclusion are important topics within organizations worldwide (Choi, 2017).
Companies recognize the need for diversity policies and a diverse workforce in todays
multicultural and global society (Ohunakin et al., 2019). Consequently, there is a growing
EDI
43,7
1130
We would like to thank the collaborating organization for providing access to their staff for the
interviews. David De Coninck was supported by funding from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)
(No: 1219824N) (DeMiSo).
Both authors contributed equally to this article.
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the KU Leuven Social and Societal Ethics Committee
(case number (G-2023-6310-R2)).
Disclosure of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/2040-7149.htm
Received 4 September 2023
Revised 9 November 2023
Accepted 8 February 2024
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion:
An International Journal
Vol. 43 No. 7, 2024
pp. 1130-1149
© Emerald Publishing Limited
2040-7149
DOI 10.1108/EDI-09-2023-0295
focus on developing inclusive policies to promote diversity within organizations (Kabat-Farr
et al., 2020). Regulatory frameworks surrounding diversity, such as quota legislation which
mandates that each gender [1] should be represented by at least one-third in the board of
directors of publicly traded companies, also aim to increase gender diversity on boards of
directors (Institute for the Equality of Women and Men, 2016). However, discrimination
against women and ethnic minorities remains a significant issue in the workplace and society
(Kartolo and Kwantes, 2019;Wozniak and MacNeill, 2020). Data from the Belgian Interfederal
Centre for Equal Opportunities [UNIA] (2021) shows a rise in reports of discriminatory acts:
they received 10,610 reports of suspected discriminatory acts in 2021, an increase of 12%
compared to 2020. The same report (2021) indicates that a quarter of all cases pertain to work
and employment.
Numerous studies have shown differential treatment based on gender and ethnic minority
status in various countries and employment sectors (Baert, 2018;Verhaeghe and De Coninck,
2022). It is essential to comprehend these discriminatory practices as research has shown that
(perceived) discrimination has a negative impact on individualswell-being (Hackett et al.,
2020) and socioeconomic status (i.e., through factors like lower wages and fewer promotion
opportunities) (Stamarski and Son Hing, 2015). A significant question in this context pertains
to motivations behind discriminatory practices in the labor market (Koopmans et al., 2019).
The most commonly proposed answer to this question posits that discrimination stems from
deliberate choices and actions by individuals (Small and Pager, 2020). However, numerous
researchers also recognize the existence of structural elements that perpetuate discrimination
(Lim et al., 2022;Small and Pager, 2020). This is what is understood in the literature as
structural discrimination. According to this perspective, unequal treatments are not solely
the result of individual actions but connected to the ways that society and its institutions are
structured (Small and Pager, 2020;Szanton et al., 2022). The significance of this structural
element associated with (employment) discrimination is often overlooked in current research.
In this study, we aim to investigate the link between organizational dimensions and the
perception of discrimination or unequal treatment in the workplace in a large organization in
Belgium. In doing so, we apply Ackers(1990,2009) framework, adapting and extending its
relevance toa non-U.S. context. The landscapeof research on structural discrimination within
organizations in Belgium remain s notably underexplored. Whi le Belgium has seen
comprehensive studies addressing discrimination in realms such as recruitment and housing
markets (Baert, 2018;Lippens et al., 2022;Verhaeghe and De Coninck, 2022), there exists a
discernible gap when it comes to understanding the intricacies of structural discrimination
within organizational settings. The limited attention underscores the need for dedicated
investigations into how organizational dimensions contribute to the perception of
discrimination or unequal treatment in the workplace. By addressing this void in the
literature, our study aims to shed light on the unique dynamics at play within Belgian
organizations, contributing valuable insights to the broader discourse on workplace equality
and fosteringa nuanced understandingof the organizational contextin the Belgian landscape.
We will focus on three key organizational dimensions that have been identified as
potential contributors to structural discrimination: organizational structure, organizational
culture and organizational policies. To do so, we developed a case study of a multinational
professional service company th rough ten semi-structured in -depth interviews with
employees of this organization.
Sociological perspectives on discrimination
Discrimination in the labor market and organizational discrimination are two distinct
concepts that require clarification. Discrimination in the labor market focuses on unequal
treatment in the selection and recruitment process. Economics, psychology and sociology
Structural
discrimination
in the
workplace
1131

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex