“I’m not white”: counter-stories from “mixed race” women navigating PhDs

Date12 January 2024
Pages91-105
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-03-2023-0097
Published date12 January 2024
AuthorRhianna Garrett
Im not white: counter-stories
from mixed racewomen
navigating PhDs
Rhianna Garrett
Department of Geography and Environment, Loughborough University,
Loughborough, UK
Abstract
Purpose This paper critiques institutional whiteness and racial categorisation in UK higher education.This
is done through the representation of the complex narratives of mixed racewomen navigating their PhD
experiences in predominantly white institutions, when their identities have proximity to whiteness.
Design/methodology/approach This study introduces five vignettes of mixed racewomen, gathered
from a wider study of 27 PhDs and early career researchers in UK higher education. The paper employs Yuval-
Davisframework of belonging and bell hooksapproach to chosen versus forced marginality to create a
conceptual framework based on fluid agency and empowerment, recognising belonging as an ongoing process.
FindingsThe findingsreveal how mixed racewomen can occupy a liminal space between belonging to and
rejecting racial categorisation, as they attempted to situate their self-identifications within the boundaries of
institutional whiteness.
Research limitations/implications The study only utilises a small sample size of five counter-stories
from a larger study on PhD career trajectories, limiting its empirical claims. It also only engages with mixed
racewomen who have proximity to whiteness, encouraging research on different mixed raceintersections.
Practical implications This paper encourages more discussion around mixed raceexperiences of UK
higher education and critical engagement with higher educations reliance on statistical data to understand
racialised communities.
Originality/value This paper contributes new empirical insights into how whiteness is experienced when
mixed racewomen negotiate their relation to it in UK higher education. It also provides theoretical
advancements into understanding of institutional whiteness and critically engages with racial categorisation.
Keywords Gender, Ethnic minorities, Qualitative, Belonging, Higher education, Racial discrimination,
Mixed race
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
White supremacy in UK higher education is often discussed as a system of central
institutional power, and providing invisible supporting structures that uphold the needs of
the majority (Tate, 2014;Joseph-Salisbury, 2019). However, it is imperative to engage in a
more nuanced exploration of whiteness that captures its inherently hostile structure through
the stories of those who challenge it. This paper critiques institutional whiteness through the
representation of mixed racewomens counter-stories navigating higher education, when
their identities have proximity to whiteness. The stories revealed a liminal space between
belonging and rejecting racial categories, transforming depending on space and place, and
present a critique of higher educations dependence on categorisation. This paper provides
new empirical insights into how whiteness is experienced when mixed racewomen
negotiate their relation to it in UK higher education.
Despite the presence of over two million mixed raceBritons today contributing to one of
the fastest growing populations in the United Kingdom (UK) (Song, 2010), there is a distinct
lack of scholarship on how mixed racepeople experiences higher education. Literature on
mixed raceidentities and experiences are dominated by the United States (US) and the UK
(Fozdar, 2022). However, the US provides more developed language that not only describes
mixed raceexperiences, but identifies prejudices that mixed racepeople experience
Counter-stories
from mixed
racewomen
91
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/2040-7149.htm
Received 30 March 2023
Revised 22 September 2023
6 November 2023
Accepted 26 November 2023
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion:
An International Journal
Vol. 44 No. 1, 2025
pp. 91-105
© Emerald Publishing Limited
2040-7149
DOI 10.1108/EDI-03-2023-0097

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex