IFRS and accounting quality: legal origin, regional, and disclosure impacts

Published date01 August 2016
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-11-2015-0075
Pages296-316
Date01 August 2016
AuthorAjit Dayanandan,Han Donker,Mike Ivanof,Gökhan Karahan
IFRS and accounting quality:
legal origin, regional, and
disclosure impacts
Ajit Dayanandan and Han Donker
College of Business and Public Policy, University of Alaska Anchorage,
Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Mike Ivanof
School of Business, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, Canada, and
Gökhan Karahan
College of Business and Public Policy, University of Alaska Anchorage,
Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine whether the quality of nancial reporting has
improved after the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Europe and
across the world. The study investigates the impact of IFRS on income smoothing and earnings
management in different geographic regions under different legal origins and disclosure environments.
Design/methodology/approach – To measure income smoothing in the pre- and post-IFRS periods,
the authors use the coefcient of variation and the panel unit root model proposed by Im et al. (2003) for
testing whether net income is stationary throughout the sample period. The study uses a dynamic panel
estimation framework, as it captures the dynamics of IFRS on discretionary accruals efciently.
Discretionary accruals are used to measure earnings management.
Findings – The results suggest that the adoption of high quality standards, such as IFRS, reduces
income smoothing and earnings management. In addition, the study nds that earnings management
has decreased in the post-IFRS period, in particular, for French and Scandinavian civil law countries,
but not for German civil law countries and common law countries. The latter can be explained by the
fact that common law countries have strong investor protection laws, strict law enforcement and high
disclosure levels of nancial information. The study also nds empirical evidence that the adoption of
IFRS reduces earnings management in countries with high levels of nancial disclosure. Overall, the
study shows that the adoption of IFRS improved the quality of nancial reporting.
Originality/value – This study is useful for accounting standard setters across the world, including
those countries that have not yet decided to adopt IFRS. The study contributes to the literature by
examining the adoption of IFRS in income smoothing and earnings management under different legal
regimes and disclosure environments by using advanced empirical methodologies.
Keywords IFRS, Disclosure, Legal systems, Earnings management, Income smoothing,
Accounting quality
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
With globalization of international nancial markets, the process of political integration
exemplied by the European Union (EU) as well as rms’ operations in different
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/1834-7649.htm
IJAIM
24,3
296
Received 6 November 2015
Revised 7 December 2015
Accepted 7 December 2015
InternationalJournal of
Accountingand Information
Management
Vol.24 No. 3, 2016
pp.296-316
©Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1834-7649
DOI 10.1108/IJAIM-11-2015-0075
jurisdictions are the driving force behind the call for a common language for nancial
reporting (Ball, 2006;Whittington, 2005;Carmona and Trombetta, 2008). The
International Accounting Standards Board developed International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) with the aim of harmonization of nancial accounting standards
across countries (Crawford et al., 2014). This initiative took a new turn when European
Union (2002) mandated (as of 1 January 2005) all companies domiciled in the EU with
shares listed on securities exchanges to prepare their consolidated accounts in
accordance with IFRS. Approximately 140 countries have now permitted IFRS adoption
for domestic listed countries. A distinctive feature of International Accounting
Standards (IAS)/IFRS standards is that they are “principles-based” instead of
“rules-based”, which include specic criteria, bright line thresholds etc. (Nelson, 2003).
The introduction of IFRS was not without controversy, with some welcoming it as a step
towards “fair value accounting”, enhancing the comparability of nancial statements
across countries, thereby generating capital market benets such as improving the
corporate transparency, liquidity and market efciency. Lowering the cost of equity
capital and improving regulatory enforcement and corporate governance were also
mentioned as expected major outcomes (Botosan, 1997;Botosan and Plumlee, 2002;Hail,
2002;Francis et al., 2004;Hail and Leuz, 2006). On the other hand, a survey of EU listed
companies in 2004 found that majority of the rms agreed with the view that IFRS
would lead to increased volatility of earnings (Jermakowicz and Gornik-Tomaszewski,
2006).
The empirical evidence about these presumed benets of IFRS is often conicting
and controversial. Research on IFRS impacts has generally focused on whether the
benets of IFRS depend on the type of adoption – mandatory or voluntary – (Daske et al.,
2008) – IFRS and information asymmetry (Leuz, 2003), whether benets of IFRS occur in
countries whose accounting standards are signicantly different from international
standards (Brochet et al., 2013), how IFRS impacts cost of equity capital (Daske, 2006;
Lambert et al., 2007), analysts’ information environment (Chalmers et al., 2012;Jansson
et al., 2012 Horton et al., 2013), value relevance (Liu et al., 2011;Jermakowicz et al., 2007;
Devalle et al., 2010;Clarkson et al., 2011) and accounting quality (Ashbaugh and Pincus,
2001;Barth et al., 2008a,2008b;Chen et al., 2010;Ahmed et al., 2013), whether IFRS
improves market liquidity (Daske et al., 2008) and IFRS and IFRS impacts in emerging
market economies such as China (Liu et al., 2011;Kim, 2013;Wang et al., 2012;Zhang
et al., 2012) and Peru (Liu et al., 2012). Zeghal and Mhedhbi (2012) demonstrate that the
development of the emerging capital markets is positively and signicantly associated
with the use of IFRS. Chen and Rezaee (2012) examined the role of corporate governance
in an emerging capital market. They show that Chinese listed companies that have a
more effective board of directors tend to be more aligned with IFRS under the Chinese
new accounting standards. Most of the extant literature examines the effect of IFRS on
a group of rms in a single country or a group of countries without consideration of the
institutional landscape of the countries (such as legal system, level of investor
protection, etc.). The impact of IFRS depends not only on the enforcement mechanisms
(Ball et al., 2003;Barth et al., 2008a,2008b;Daske et al., 2008) but also on reporting
incentives of rms, which are shaped by a number of institutional factors such as legal
system, taxation systems and nancing systems of countries (Nobes, 2006,2013;
Jeanjean and Stolowy, 2008;Kvaal and Nobes, 2010). Solsma and Wilder (2015) nd that
US listed foreign rms applying IFRS report pro forma disclosures more frequently
297
IFRS and
accounting
quality

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex