How do different forms of early employment instability affect future employment chances? A factorial survey experiment with employers

Date13 August 2024
Pages1738-1755
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2023-0320
Published date13 August 2024
Subject MatterEconomics,Labour economics
AuthorLulu P. Shi
How do different forms of early
employment instability affect
future employment chances?
A factorial survey experiment
with employers
Lulu P. Shi
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Abstract
Purpose Periodic economic instabilities and structural changes in the labour market have given rise to a
variety of forms of job insecurity. This article compares the scarring effects of different forms of job insecurity
on future employment chances, and how they vary across education groups.
Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of real vacancies and data collected in a vignette
experiment with employers in Switzerland, a country with a strongly developed vocational education and
training (VET) system, this article investigates how employers evaluate a period of unemployment, job
hopping and work experience in deskilling jobs when hiring candidates.
Findings The findings reveal that work in deskilling jobs is by far more scarring than unemployment or job
hopping. The study also demonstrates that applicants with upper secondary vocational education are
impacted the greatest by all three forms of job insecurity.
Originality/value The study makes use of real vacancies. While experiments have the strength of high
internal validity, most experimental studies in recruitment research rely on students as respondents. As this
study works with real employers hiring for positions it benefits from high external validity.
Keywords Education, Factorial survey experiment, Hiring, Employment instability, Scarring,
School-to-work transition, Vocational education and training (VET)
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
This article analyses and compares the impact of different forms of employment instability
at an early career stage on individuals’ later employment chances, and how they vary across
education groups. Young people are comparatively more likely to find themselves
unemployed, in mismatched jobs or with fixed-term contracts [1]. The reasons for the
labour market precarity of young people are complex and have been explained by different
factors, such as possessing little work experience, being less effective in the job search and
having a smaller network of contacts (Bell and Blanchflower, 2011). The goal of this paper is
not to explain why young people are more vulnerable; rather, the aim is to understand how
early employment instabilities may affect their future employment chances. A difficult entry
into the labour market can impact individuals’ careers in the long run in the form of decreased
employment prospects or lower wages (Bell and Blanchflower, 2011), these negative impacts
IJM
45,9
1738
The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of
the Swiss Government.
Funding: The study was funded by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and
Innovation (SERI) (Nos. 15.0089 and 649395) as part of the Horizon 2020 project “Negotiating early job-
insecurity and labour market exclusion in Europe -NEGOTIATE” (Horizon 2020, Societal Challenge 6,
H2020 - YOUNG SOCIETY-2014 and YOUNG-1-2014).
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/0143-7720.htm
Received 18 June 2023
Revised 29 December 2023
26 March 2024
28 May 2024
Accepted 26 June 2024
InternationalJournal of Manpower
Vol. 45 No. 9, 2024
pp. 1738-1755
© Emerald Publishing Limited
0143-7720
DOI 10.1108/IJM-06-2023-0320
are often referred to as “scarring effects”. This article provides an understanding of how
employers contribute to the scarring effect.
There is established evidence for unemployment scarring (e.g. Arulampalam et al., 2000).
However, the consequences of different forms of employment instability have most often
been studied separately, and little is known about how they impact future employment
chances in comparison to one another. Yet, with changing labour market structures, such as
deregulation or the rise of the gig economy, the transition phase from education into
employment has become more complex (for an overview see Karamessini et al., 2015), and
young people may face the choice between taking up a job poorly suited to their skills profile,
a fixed-term position or unemployment.
Only a handful of studies – Pedulla (2016),Nunley et al. (2017) and Baert and Verhaest
(2019) – have compared the effect of unemployment and skills mismatch. The findings are
mixed, partly due to different definitions for skills mismatch, partly to different
operationalisation of key variables and the mixed results also highlight the context-
dependency of the determining factors for career outcomes. Studies that statistically
compare the effects of more than two forms of employment instability are lacking.
Addressing this gap, this article compares the effects of three common forms of employment
instability – unemployment, job hopping and work in deskilling jobs – on future employment
prospects. The first aim of this study is to compare the effects of three different forms of
employment instability.
Secondly, this study aims to understand the role of education in moderating the effects of
early employment instability with a focus on the vocational education. School-to-work
literature has shown that employers draw on applicants’ education credentials when making
hiring decisions. Especially for younger workers with little work experience, education is
crucial information. Credentials can reveal specific information about the type and level of
skills of the applicants (Becker, 1964), or they can be used as a cue for applicants’ trainability
and capabilities (Stiglitz, 1975). In Switzerland, a country with strongly standardised
vocational education and training (VET), the vocational credential is particularly informative
for the employer as the vocational titles reveal the exact skills the applicant received the
training for. Credentials can also be used instrumentally to create barriers to entry into
certain occupations (Bol and Weeden, 2015). There is extensive research on the relationship
between education and labour market outcomes such as propensity to be employed or
lifetime earnings, and there is a large body of literature on specifically discussing the VET
(e.g. Iannelli and Raffe, 2007;Solga et al., 2014;Forster et al., 2016;Hoidn and
S
tastn
y, 2023).
However, less is known about how education contributes to re-employment chances after a
turbulent career start. An exception is Shi and Valentina (2022) who studied how education
can moderate job finding chances after initial unemployment and indeed found evidence for
the moderating effect of education. However, how education may moderate employment
chances after experiencing forms of employment instability other than unemployment has
been a neglected research area. This study addresses this research gap.
This paper has a specific focus on the scarring effect of employment instability for the
vocationally educated applicants. The upper secondary dual VET system has been praised
to facilitate the school-to-work transition, resulting in a low degree of skills mismatch and
youth unemployment (Shavit and M
uller, 1988). Less investigated is the school-to-work
transition for graduates of vocational tertiary education: graduates from the universities of
applied sciences. In comparison to the upper secondary VET system, the universities of
applied sciences are relatively new and were established only in the mid 1990s (OPET, 2010).
There is evidence that that the return on education measured in earnings is higher for
vocational tertiary graduates in comparison to academic tertiary graduates at least in the
career entry stage (Backes-Gellner and Geel, 2014), but a comparison between the upper
secondary and tertiary vocational education is lacking. A particular interest in this article is
International
Journal of
Manpower
1739

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex