Harmonising European Insolvency Law: The Emerging Role of Stakeholders

Date01 June 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1303
Published date01 June 2018
AuthorGert‐Jan Boon
Harmonising European Insolvency Law: The
Emerging Role of Stakeholders
Gert-Jan Boon*
,
Leiden Law School, University of Leiden, Netherlands
Abstract
In recent years, the European Commission has given increased room for stake-
holder involvement in the area of insolvency and restructuring. In revising the Eu-
ropean Insolvency Regulation in 20122015 and preparing the proposal for a
directive on preventive restructuring frameworks 2016, the role and direct inu-
ence of stakeholders has been noteworthy. In these efforts, the Commission touched
upon a eld of law characterised by diverse stakeholders with strongly opposing in-
terests. Following the active involvement of all stakeholders by the Commission, this
study examines what relevant stakeholders are, what their positions are with respect
to European Union insolvency legislation and what their role has been and can be
in legislative processes in the area of insolvency and restructuring. Copyright ©
2018 INSOL International and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
I. Introduction
Since the 2011 call of the European Parliament for legislative measures with re-
gard to insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law,
1
reform of in-
solvency regimes has been prominent on academic and legislative agendas.
2
In
subsequent efforts, the Commission acted in a largely untapped area of
harmonising substantive insolvency law. A eld of law characterised by diverse
stakeholders with strongly opposing interests, including, among others, the debtor,
the debtors management, shareholders, employees, nanciers, secured and
*E-mail: j.m.g.j.boon@law.leidenuniv.nl
For this chapter, the developments with regard to
harmonisation of European insolvency law have been
stated as per 1 January 2018. At the same date all in-
ternet sources have been checked. The author is grate-
ful to the comments of the two anonymous referees.
The author also thanks Professor Bob Wessels for his
comments on an earlier draft.
1. European Parliament Resolution of 15 November
2011 with recommendations to the Commission on in-
solvency proceedings in the context of EU company
law (2011/2006(INI)).
2. Ian Fletcher and Bob Wessels, Harmonisation of Insol-
vency Law in Europe (Reports presented to the
Nederlandse Vereniging voor Burgerlijk Recht
(Netherlands Association of Civil Law)) (2012, Kluwer,
Deventer).
Copyright © 2018 INSOL International and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Int. Insolv. Rev., Vol. 27: 150177 (2018)
Published online 22 May 2018 in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/iir.1303
unsecured creditors and tax authorities. In its approach, the Commission actively
involved all these stakeholders.
This article will discuss, what the author will call, the integrated stakeholder ap-
proach that the Commission pursues in harmonising European insolvency regimes.
Both in its revision of the European Insolvency Regulation (2000)
3
(EIR 2000) and
in its work on a proposal for a directive on preventive restructuring frameworks;
second chance and measures to increase the efciency of restructuring; and insol-
vency and discharge procedures (Restructuring Directive),
4
the role and direct in-
uence of stakeholders is noteworthy. The questions in this article concern what is
a relevant stakeholder, why is the Commission involving them and whether and
under which conditions it is justied to involve stakeholders in designing and ex-
ecution of EU insolvency legislation.
This article is organised as follows. Section II will introduce the topic of stake-
holders in insolvency and will elaborate on some theories regarding stakeholders.
A technique will be proposed to distinguish and rank different types of stakeholders
based on their salience. Subsequently, in Section III, this approach will be applied
to dene stakeholders in the eld of insolvency legislation. In Section IV, the sen-
sibility of stakeholder involvement will be discussed by reviewing how the role of
stakeholders in insolvency law has evolved over time. Then, in Section V, the ap-
proach of the European Commission toward harmonising substantive insolvency
and stakeholders will be discussed. Section VI will turn to the sentiments of differ-
ent stakeholders on harmonisation. This will be followed by some recommenda-
tions to pursue, with the involvement of stakeholders, the Commissionsaim of
harmonising certain aspects of national insolvency regimes (Section VII). Finally,
Section VII draws some conclusions.
II. Exploration of the Stakeholder
The relevance of stakeholder involvement in the eld of insolvency was advocated
by, for example, EU Commissioner Věra Jourová. The EU Commissioner for Jus-
tice, Consumers and Gender Equality touched upon this in her speech of 16 June
2016 held at the occasion of the 5th European insolvency and restructuring con-
gress where she spoke on the harmonisation process of European insolvency law.
The EU Commissioner emphasised the important role of practitioners and judges
to bring legislation alive and bring forward the benets of legislation to the whole
of the internal market. But their involvement is also required in designing new leg-
islation. In particular, in drafting the new legislative instrument on substantive in-
solvency law, EU Commissioner Věra Jourová stated:
3. Council Regulation (EC) No. 1346/2000 of 29 May
2000 on insolvency proceedings (EIR 2000) was re-
vised by the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2015/848
of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings (recast)
(EIR 2015).
4. European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of
the European Union and the Council on preventive
restructuring frameworks, second chance and measures
to increase the efciency of restructuring, insolvency
and discharge procedures and amending Directive
2012/30/EU of 22 November 2016, COM(2016)
723 nal (Restructuring Directive).
Stakeholders in Harmonising EU Insolvency Law 151
Copyright © 2018 INSOL International and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Int. Insolv. Rev., Vol. 27: 150177 (2018)
DOI: 10.1002/iir

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT