Guest editorial: Racially minoritised women academics in the global academy
| Date | 27 January 2025 |
| Pages | 1-8 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2025-549 |
| Published date | 27 January 2025 |
| Author | Yaz Iyabo Osho |
Guest editorial:
Racially minoritised women
academics in the global academy
While the terms to refer to BAME, BME, POC, and BIPOC evolve, the experiences of these groups,
particularly those facing intersectional disadvantages, remain largely the same.
This Special Issue, akin to the evolving field of EDI theory and practice, has changed direction,
which, of course, is part of a scholarly process of peer review and response to the field of
research. Wehave witnessed changes in words, phrases, collective terms and acronyms used to
refer to racially minoritised individuals and communities in recent times. The Special Issue,
conceived in 2022, coincided with the height of the Black Lives Matter Movement, the
proliferation of spending on organisational EDI/DEI initiatives and widespread contention
over terms to refer to racially minoritised people.
About terminology
From the outset, this Special Issue was positioned as one that would explore the experiences of
what were commonly termed “BAME” women academics within the context of the global
academy. As a result, the initial title for this Special Issue was “BAME Women Academics in
the Global Academy”. For editorial reasons, a couple of years passed between the proposal
submission to Emerald and the writing of this Guest Editor Introduction to the Special Issue,
which moves us to the present day,and the new title: “Racially Minoritised WomenAcademics
in the Global Academy”.
Although terms for heterogeneous and minoritised communities have always been
fractious, contentious and changeable, this discussion has rapidly gained pace in the last three
years. Moreover, in the UK, where the term “BAME” was most used (Law Society, 2023;
Selvarajah et al., 2020), a report commissioned by the UK Prime Minister found that aggregate
terms such as “BAME” were unhelpful in describing different ethnic groups and should be
“dropped” (Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities, 2021). Likewise, BAME can be seen
as “unhelpful, misleading and [in] conflict with the rigour of modern research” (Roche et al.,
2024, p. 201).
In part, it is arguable that this contention reached its peak at the height ofthe global outbreak
of COVID-19, where racially minoritised communities were disproportionately impacted
in terms of mortality and morbidity along with the worsening of existing inequalities
(Bhatia, 2020;Public Health England, 2020). In this context, it was found to be essential to
disaggregate data collected across ethnic groupings to uncover the real impact of the virus
(Parliament, 2020) drawing attention to the woefully problematic use of “BAME”.
Although, on a global scale, there is no agreed term or satisfactory definition to denote the
groups that are often referred to as “ethnic minorities”, “POC”, “BAME”, “ethnically diverse”
or “BIPOC”, there are some categorisations that are less contentious, for instance, terms such
as Global Ethnic Majority (GEM) and racially minoritised, the latter of which this Editorial
adopts. The use of GEM positions ethnicities within a rightfully global context, and the term
racially minoritised spotlights the social process shaped by power, as well as the process of
positioning groups as a minority. The preference for the use of “racially minoritised” is multi-
faceted. First, racially minoritised explicitly encompasses a social constructivist approach in
recognising that individuals, groups and communities are minoritised by others as opposed to
naturally existing as a minority (Gunaratnum, 2003). Second, the term centres “race”, unlike
“BAME” or GEM. Racially minoritised speaks to an acknowledgement that some groups,
Equality,Diversity
and Inclusion: An
International
Journal
1
Equality,Diversity and Inclusion: An
InternationalJournal
Vol.44 No. 1, 2025
pp.1-8
©Emerald Publishing Limited
e-ISSN:2040-7157
p-ISSN:2040-7149
DOI10.1108/EDI-02-2025-549
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations