Guest editorial: Chasing truth and (Re)Conciliation: navigating contexts, tensions and consequences

Date10 September 2024
Pages1001-1006
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-08-2024-430
Published date10 September 2024
AuthorRick Colbourne,Ana Maria Peredo
Guest editorial: Chasing truth and
(Re)Conciliation: navigating
contexts, tensions
and consequences
Since the 1970s, many governments have been forced to address the demands of thousands of
victims of historical systemic violence. Commissions in search of the truth and considering
means of reconciliation were established in many countries, including Argentina, Uganda,
Chile, El Salvador, South Africa, Guatemala, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Bosnia, Yugoslavia,
Ghana, East Timor, Peru, Rwanda, Morocco, Liberia and Canada, among others. These
commissions typically focus on documenting the truth of what happened during periods of
conflict, repression or systemic injustice, providing a platform for victims to share their
experiences and recommending ways to address the consequences of these abuses. The
underlying assumption of these efforts is that a shared understanding of past wrongs is
crucial for reconciliation and the rebuilding of trust within societies.
However, the relationship between uncovering the truth and achieving reconciliation is
complex and not always straightforward. While knowing the truth can be an essential part of
healing, it does not automatically lead to reconciliation. Factors such as the nature of the
disclosures, the responses from the perpetrators and the broader community and the social
and political climate can influence the outcome. Moreover, the processes of these
commissions can sometimes reopen old wounds or be perceived as insufficient or biased,
complicating efforts toward national healing.
It was not until South Africa in 1995 that the word “reconciliation”was added to the title of
commissions aimed at truth-seeking. It seems that the word “reconciliation” not only
broadened the scope of these commissions but also added a level of accountability and
possibilities for action, which heightened expectations regarding their outcomes. It
suggested a dual commitment: to uncover the factual past and to actively facilitate the
healing of societies torn by conflicts and injustices. Hayner states, “A truth commission can
promote reconciliation, outline needed reforms, allow victims a cathartic airing of their pains,
and represent an important, official acknowledgment of a long-silenced past” (1996, p. 19). In
other words, reconciliation has been seen as a potential tool to deliver justice for people,
communities and nations to live in the present and to move into a better future.
While reconciliation represents a significant global response against systemic violence
and a tool for justice and lasting peace, each commission’s approach, successes and
challenges vary, highlighting the nuanced and contextual nature of seeking truth and
reconciliation in societies striving to overcome painful pasts.
In Canada, Indigenous community members and their allies gathered in 2021 during the
first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation to reflect on residential schools’ dark legacy
and call on all Canadians to understand and act on the legacies of colonization. Murray
Sinclair, former Chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, stated that “getting to the
truth was hard, but getting to the reconciliation is going to be harder” (Sinclair, 2021).
Wakerakatste Louise McDonald Herne, Bear Clan Mother for the Mohawk Nation Council,
called on Canadians to “know the history of this country and the corruption it was built upon.
You need to correct the wrongs, and you have to own your own truth” (CBC, 2021). Algonquin
Elder Claudette Commanda observed that the discovery of unmarked graves near former
residential school sites has awakened the country to its history, “Two-hundred and fifteen
Equality,
Diversity and
Inclusion: An
International
Journal
1001
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion:
An International Journal
Vol. 43 No. 6, 2024
pp. 1001-1006
© Emerald Publishing Limited
2040-7149
DOI 10.1108/EDI-08-2024-430

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex