Geneva Securities Convention and Russian Civil Legislation Reform: Comparative Perspectives

AuthorM. Botvinov
PositionUniversity of Geneva (Geneva, Switzerland)
Pages26-39
BRICS LAW JOURNAL Volume IV (2017) Issue 1
GENEVA SECURITIES CONVENTION AND RUSSIAN CIVIL LEGISLATION
REFORM: COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES
MIKHAIL BOTVINOV,
University of Geneva (Geneva, Switzerland)
DOI: 10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-1-26-39
The Russian Parliament has modied the Civil Code recently. This reform has also covered
the regime of uncerticated securities. Under the modied Civil Code (RCC) uncerticated
securities do not constitute chattels but claims and other rights against the issuer. The
legislator has also precised such issues as the methods of transfer and the creation of
an interest upon those securities (Art. 149.2 of the RCC), the protection of the titleholder
including the rights of a bona de purchaser (Art. 149.3 of the RCC) and the liabilit y of
an intermediary resulting from the loss of the records (Art. 149.5 of the RCC).
In 2008, in Switzerland, the Parliament has adopted the Federal Intermediated Securities
Act (FISA). The present Act has introduced a new object to the Swiss legal order: an
intermediated security. The intermediated securities are distinguished from those in
paper form and from the immobilized securities. The Swiss delegation has participated
actively in the preparatory works that resulted later in the adoption of the UNIDROIT
Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities, also known as Geneva
Securities Convention. However, this Convention has not been ratied by Switzerland.
The author analyzes the key issues of the reform in relation to uncerticated securities. We
examine in particular whether the provisions governing the regime of uncerticated securities
under the modied Civil Code of the Russian Federation have become more compatible with
Geneva Securities Convention. Finally, we will try to explain why this Convention is not in
force and whether the Russian Federation and Switzerland could ratify it.
Keywords: Russian law; uncerticated securities; intermediated securities; Swiss law;
Geneva Securities Convention; legal reform; comparative law; security; UNIDROIT.
Recommended citation: Mikhail Botvinov, Geneva Securities Convention and
Russian Civil Legislation Reform: Comparative Perspectives, 4(1) BRICS Law Journal
26–39 (2017).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT